FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-10-2002, 06:09 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lancaster, OH
Posts: 1,792
Post

I agree with S2;


I'm not familiar with the theological language, but doesn't the church claim that priests are on a direct line with the Big Guy? And if he is so omnipotent, why the heck can't he control these weak-willed priests? Doesn't he know how this will look?
GaryP is offline  
Old 06-10-2002, 06:11 AM   #22
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 108
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by GaryP:
<strong>I agree with S2;


I'm not familiar with the theological language, but doesn't the church claim that priests are on a direct line with the Big Guy? And if he is so omnipotent, why the heck can't he control these weak-willed priests? Doesn't he know how this will look?</strong>
You're absolutely right. How dare the Almighty not make them into carefully controlled automatons!
tragic_pizza is offline  
Old 06-10-2002, 07:05 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 1162 easy freeway minutes from the new ICR in TX
Posts: 896
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tragic_pizza:
<strong>

You're absolutely right. How dare the Almighty not make them into carefully controlled automatons!</strong>
Hmmm.... So the Almighty got himself into a position where he could write the rules to ensure that he is *never* held accountable for anything that occurs on his watch. Nice work if you get it! Even Ken Lay doesn't have it this good!

[ June 10, 2002: Message edited by: S2Focus ]</p>
S2Focus is offline  
Old 06-10-2002, 07:46 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lancaster, OH
Posts: 1,792
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tragic_pizza:
<strong>

You're absolutely right. How dare the Almighty not make them into carefully controlled automatons!</strong>
tp-- I think there's a big difference between automatons and allowing his reps. on earth to be abusing kids. Even this Atheist can figure out that difference.
GaryP is offline  
Old 06-10-2002, 04:36 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: hereabouts
Posts: 734
Angry

Maybe they figure one molestation is okay because then no-one will believe the kid. Two, they have a problem, because the second one may step forward and say "Yeah, he did that to me, too".
One of the last sane is offline  
Old 06-10-2002, 09:27 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rochester NY USA
Posts: 4,318
Post

This article, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9255-2002Jun6.html" target="_blank">Why Didn't the Church Call the Cops?</a> by Charles Krauthammer, appeared in my Sunday paper. IMHO its title is the most disturbing question of the whole scandal, followed closely by "Why didn't the parents call the cops?". I've asked both questions but still haven't gotten a good answer....

Quote:
From the article:

The very talk about whether a child-molesting priest should be defrocked for one strike or more is beside the point. What America wants to know is not how the Catholic leadership will discipline its clergy. That is its own business. Separation of church and state dictates that churches deal with ecclesiastical offenses -- whether sins or heresies or deviations of any kind -- by their own rules and strictures.

How the church treats sin is not a concern for non-Catholics. Of absolute concern for non-Catholics, however, is how the church treats crime -- whether it reports criminality occurring within its gates for adjudication and punishment by secular authorities. That is the test. It is a test not of faith but of citizenship.
Andy
PopeInTheWoods is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 06:20 AM   #27
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 108
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by GaryP:
<strong>

tp-- I think there's a big difference between automatons and allowing his reps. on earth to be abusing kids. Even this Atheist can figure out that difference.</strong>
I see your point, but have to protest. At what point does God become culpable for mankind's own bad choices? God didn't make the priests molest kids, any more than He made the terrorists fly into the WTC. The responsibility is upon the perpetrators, and upon the Church who hides their evil.

We are either creatures of free will or we are not. You cannot have it both ways.
tragic_pizza is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 07:36 AM   #28
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 334
Post

They should just ass rape god and get it over with. Just leave the children alone.
Starspun is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 07:59 AM   #29
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 108
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Starspun:
<strong>They should just ass rape god and get it over with. Just leave the children alone.</strong>
Way to contribute to the discussion there. You don't have issues at all, do you?
tragic_pizza is offline  
Old 06-11-2002, 10:13 AM   #30
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 334
Angry

I think we all have issues with child molesters; especially if they are allowed to hide behind a power structure, in this case, religion.
From birth (usually) these kids are taught to trust the church and the priest. Especially in the catholic church with their rituals, one being confession. These kids are taken advantage of fully, and I will go out on a limb and say that most are to scared to talk because of the wrath of god that will befall them.
Starspun is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.