FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-10-2002, 04:22 AM   #21
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nowhere Land
Posts: 441
Cool

In a way Beoran, you're right. Life is not black and white.

If you had problem with Kant's 1st categorial imperative, which is universality, you could try his second one which is :

To treat humanity whether in your own person or in the person of any other never simply as a means but always at the same time as end.

The United Nation was built on this imperative...you could try to make it part of your life, and you will find that it is not only humane, but also has fewer or no gray areas.

------------------------------------------------

I read something is the newspaper which is very beautiful, though not exactly about Kant.

It's about life in the Kashmir.

Indians, because they do not eat cow, sell them to the Pakistani. On the other hand, Pakistani, because they do not eat pigs, sell them to the Indians.

It just goes to show you, men are not naturally enemies. Only governments and religions.

[ December 14, 2002: Message edited by: Rousseau_CHN ]</p>
Rousseau_CHN is offline  
Old 12-10-2002, 08:05 AM   #22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 75
Post

Hmmm... but by what standards do I get to choose my categorical imperative? It is just by my preference, or? As for humaneness, that has been known(bu not always practised) since Confucius' time.
Beoran is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:34 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.