Freethought & Rationalism Archive

mongrel · 05-02-2003, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by malai5
Dear mongrel

We are not seeking a following, as this is nothing to do with a ''cult''.
Whether you take what we post seriously or not is not at issue here. We post, you read, if you want to, we answer questions on the material. It's as simple as that.
Unsubstantiated in 3D terms the articles may be, but that fact alone, as you know, has never stopped the truth of information on this earth emerging at some point down the track.
Einstein and his ''theories'' was considered, at one point, a ''nut job''. How many more instances of this type could we quote?
Study the history of science, what was once unproven ''extraordinary claims'', became the corner stone of modern science.
We have no reason to doubt our contacts or the information we receive from them, as they have proven themselves to our complete satisfaction.

Cheers

Malai5.

You could quite rightly(IMHO) quote many instances of people being labelled "nut-jobs", but proving themselves right in the long-run.

But, I believe there are a much greater number that have proven themselves to be "nut-jobs".

How have your contacts proven themselves?

Godless Dave · 05-02-2003, 11:49 AM

DNFTT

mongrel · 05-02-2003, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Godless Dave
DNFTT

Yeah, I know. But they just look so cute when they look at you with those big, begging, puppy-troll eyes...

GunnerJ · 05-02-2003, 02:59 PM

Here's a useful resource for dealing with this loon:

The Crackpot Index

Duvenoy · 05-02-2003, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GunnerJ
Here's a useful resource for dealing with this loon:

The Crackpot Index

I got a head start on everybody. Score me for 50 points!

doov

Defiant Heretic · 05-02-2003, 09:47 PM

Quote:

1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false.

How are we supposed to calculate that? He's making up so many terms, I can't even make out what he's saying!

malai5, are you referring to yourself in the royal 'we', or do you have some form of Disassociative Identity Disorder?

HelenM · 05-03-2003, 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Defiant Heretic
malai5, are you referring to yourself in the royal 'we', or do you have some form of Disassociative Identity Disorder?

There is a team of three on whose behalf he writes. Three as in, if you look at them you'd see three people

. So, not DID.

Helen

malai5 · 05-03-2003, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mongrel
You could quite rightly(IMHO) quote many instances of people being labelled "nut-jobs", but proving themselves right in the long-run.

But, I believe there are a much greater number that have proven themselves to be "nut-jobs".

How have your contacts proven themselves?

Dear mongrel.

We have been associated with our contacts for over 3 years now and in that time we have been guided by them through many ''life'' situations, including a court case. The information we have been given as to persons, motives, and outcomes we have trusted and used to plan our strategy, especially in the court case. ALL of the information has proved to be 100% accurate, even to the outcome of the case. We have trusted the information even when common sense would have lead us in another direction. We have never been let down. In all this, we have raised fear in others who could not understand how we came to possess the information we had. Even our Legal Council was asking us to request information even on the ''Court Steps''.

We have been trusting implicitly in the information we receive for the guidence received and the accuracy cannot be faulted.

The track record we cannot deny, so we have no reason to doubt that the information we post would be of any less veracity.
We could detail many, many instances in our lives over the past 3 years where the guidence we received was deadly accurate. Never, have we been lead astray. We would bank our lives upon the information we receive and those we receive it from.

Cheers

Malai5.

Defiant Heretic · 05-03-2003, 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by HelenM
There is a team of three on whose behalf he writes. Three as in, if you look at them you'd see three people . So, not DID.

Thanks, Helen.

malai5, do either of those people explain these terms and/or concepts better than you do?

malai5 · 05-03-2003, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Defiant Heretic
Thanks, Helen.

malai5, do either of those people explain these terms and/or concepts better than you do?

Dear Defiant Heretic.

The job of explainations is down to me. Any question you have on the material, will be answered from a universal point of view, but understandable in 3D terms.

Cheers

Malai5.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

05-02-2003, 11:49 AM	#32
Godless Dave Contributor Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast? Posts: 10,762	DNFTT

05-02-2003, 02:59 PM	#34
GunnerJ Banned Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want Posts: 4,871	Here's a useful resource for dealing with this loon: The Crackpot Index

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.