FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Secular Community Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

View Poll Results: How Much Diversity As An Atheist Do you accept?
I Accept Any Kind Of Diversity A Person Has or Likes. 24 58.54%
I Accept Most Diversity and Some I Expect To Follow My Ideas. 15 36.59%
I Expect Others To Follow Most Of My Ideas Mostly with Some Exceptions Of Diversity. 1 2.44%
Atheist should follow most common interest. I don't accept much Diversity in others. 0 0%
Other? If that can be explained? 1 2.44%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2003, 03:55 PM   #21
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Aberdeen, Washington
Posts: 434
Default

... There is a certain liking, taste and a desire for me in how I like to be more intimate with with a woman's body type. Maybe this was kind of the undiscribed part of these things? Yet, I still meant a whole wide range of things.

... My liking, taste and desire for the woman's body type has been a new and learned lesson from a few other Threads here. What that is for me is: Slim, Thin, Waif and even Athletic. Also I do not like breast any bigger than B34. A32 would be more ideal for me. I'm not saying women have to be unhealthy, anorexia and boney. Yet with some contours of the bone and muscles, that looks erotic for me. I do get an empathy of feeling erotic sensations in my own bones that feels good and healthy. Maybe other people don't get this experience? I had gotten a sense of some other people here who appeared disgusted with it. Yet, I would then like to know even if this was part of a Diversity of one's likes, wants and desires. That this should or should not have someone's disagreeable implications on the matter of someone else's in this same matter? So I learned that "Voluptiousness" is not just: "Erotic and Sensual" as I thought it meant by that alone. That it meant bigger and more curvey with a woman's body type. So I learned something.
I have a lot of different things about me then with the popular and normal ideas with a lot of people. So that is partly my side of things here for now.
Birdsmgp is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 05:21 PM   #22
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 109
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally posted by LadyShea
The only common factor atheists share is a disbelief in deities. On all other topics and subjects they are as diverse as any other segment of the popultaion.
Ditto on that.
Anson is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 05:40 PM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

Quote:
My liking, taste and desire for the woman's body type has been a new and learned lesson from a few other Threads here. What that is for me is: Slim, Thin, Waif and even Athletic. Also I do not like breast any bigger than B34. A32 would be more ideal for me. I'm not saying women have to be unhealthy, anorexia and boney. Yet with some contours of the bone and muscles, that looks erotic for me. I do get an empathy of feeling erotic sensations in my own bones that feels good and healthy. Maybe other people don't get this experience? I had gotten a sense of some other people here who appeared disgusted with it. Yet, I would then like to know even if this was part of a Diversity of one's likes, wants and desires. That this should or should not have someone's disagreeable implications on the matter of someone else's in this same matter? So I learned that "Voluptiousness" is not just: "Erotic and Sensual" as I thought it meant by that alone. That it meant bigger and more curvey with a woman's body type. So I learned something.
Thank you, this is clear and understandable. Many men prefer thin women and small breasts..."beauty is in the eye of the beholder" means that the person who is looking determines what he finds attractive. There is nothing wrong or strange about having specifc tastes in women.

The only problem I can foresee, is that you are very focused on the physical attributes and have a long list of criteria...but make no mention of personality traits you would like in a partner. Most women would be offended if you approached them based on their body type, but don't care about their mind at all.
Viti is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:49 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.