Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-28-2003, 12:31 PM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
|
|
07-28-2003, 12:35 PM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
|
Quote:
Fatherphil is right. Anyone caught porking under 21 should be thrown in the slammer for 30 days. Period. |
|
07-28-2003, 12:42 PM | #13 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,686
|
Quote:
UMoC |
|
07-28-2003, 12:46 PM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 2,125
|
18 for my son. 21 for my daughter. 16 for everyone else's kids.
|
07-28-2003, 12:54 PM | #15 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC, 5th floor, on the left
Posts: 372
|
Quote:
|
|
07-28-2003, 02:38 PM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rochester NY USA
Posts: 4,318
|
A quick legal question:
In the USA, the age of consent is generally 18 correct? So what happens if two 15-year-olds have otherwise consensual sex with each other? Can they both be charged with statuatory rape? Andy |
07-28-2003, 02:46 PM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
The age of consent in Canada is actually fourteen as far as I can recall, though you cannot have anal sex until you are eighteen (that will probably change eventually). I think a two tiered system would be good, with a two year difference limit for those between fourteen and sixteen (or numbers somewhere around those).
|
07-28-2003, 02:47 PM | #18 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC, 5th floor, on the left
Posts: 372
|
Quote:
Dal |
|
07-28-2003, 02:55 PM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 920B Milo Circle
Lafayette, CO
Posts: 3,515
|
Quote:
|
|
07-28-2003, 02:55 PM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW 31 52 24W4
Posts: 1,508
|
From Parliamentary Research Branch Publications - Virtual Library
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|