FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2003, 02:40 AM   #41
HRG
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 2,406
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Free Thinkr




I was under the impression that criminal idifference is indeed a punisable offense. Can anyone help me out here? Given the hypothetical scenario of a child drowning in a pool while someone who can swim watches, I believe that person can be prosecuted.
Depends on the country or state. Most European countries do punish such an omission to act, if you could save the child without endangering yourself - not as murder, but with jail sentences (up to several years if the child actually dies).
Quote:

Now, let's say that a gunman robs a liquor store and no one tries to stop him. I don't believe that'd fit because they don't necessarily have the ability to stop the gunman.
But if you have the ability to stop a felony without putting yourself into danger, you are guilty of a crime (IIANM, both in the US and Europe).
Quote:

God, if omnipotent, would always have the ability to stop suffering.
That's exactly the point. There is no "lack of ability" or "putting myself into danger" defense available to an omnipotent being.

Regards,
HRG.
HRG is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:50 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.