FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2002, 01:58 PM   #111
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by leonarde:
<strong>Vorkosigan posted:
To my ears these "forgery" scenarios seem more and
more like JFK assasination conspiracy theories:
based on little and frequently self-refuting.
Earlier it was claimed that merely the "brother of
Yeshua" part was added much later. NOW someone (John Lupia) is claiming that the WHOLE inscription is fraudulent. Hold on to your hats: more theories to "explain" the ossuary are issued every week.....

Cheers!</strong>
Of course, none of the JFK conspiracy theories come close to being as ludicrous as the "magic bullet" theory put forth by the Warren Commission. Or the ressurection story claimed by Xians.
Kosh is offline  
Old 11-04-2002, 09:34 PM   #112
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by leonarde:
<strong>Vorkosigan posted:
To my ears these "forgery" scenarios seem more and
more like JFK assasination conspiracy theories:
based on little and frequently self-refuting.
Cheers!</strong>
There's nothing "self-refuting" about Lupia's analysis, leo. He's a sober scholar with a strong perception. If part of the inscription is a forgery, as it stands it is a forgery.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:23 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.