Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-05-2003, 09:28 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA USA
Posts: 870
|
Dear Bumble Bee Tuna:
Correction. George W. Bush is not the president. He is a usurper. Ditto God (or god), most likely--at least according to the Gnostics, who held that Yahweh was an evil demiurge who created this world without quite knowing how. It is our job, they say, to escape it. |
07-05-2003, 11:08 AM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hull UK
Posts: 854
|
Quote:
|
|
07-05-2003, 12:05 PM | #33 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 247
|
Isn't his name Jealous ?
|
07-05-2003, 03:33 PM | #34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middletown, CT
Posts: 7,333
|
beastmaster: I stand corrected, sort of.
-B |
07-05-2003, 04:07 PM | #35 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,038
|
Quote:
|
|
07-05-2003, 05:14 PM | #36 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 197
|
Arken:
“Think of it this way... there's people named Guy and there's just a person who's a guy.” “On the other hand, capitalizing the 'h' in 'him' when referring to God is just weird.” I think we don’t need to capitalize god. It’s not a name, it’s not a title. It’s just one of many fictional characters from religion. Capitalizing “h” in “him” is just ridiculous. It reminded me “Analyze this”: - Did you talk to the guy? - What guy? - The guy with the thing. - What thing? I wish we would hear a dialog like this: - Did you pray to God? - What is god? - The God, you know, from religion. - What is religion? Well, eventually, humanity will forget about this “guy” with his “thing” and move on. Cheers. |
07-05-2003, 06:42 PM | #37 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
|
Quote:
|
|
07-05-2003, 07:03 PM | #38 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
Posts: 1,994
|
Quote:
|
|
07-06-2003, 12:44 AM | #39 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,320
|
Quote:
The proper name argument IS valid, but as Magus shows, there is a possiblity that the convention could be mistaken as a sign of respect. I shall henceforth break the proper name convention in this case to avoid any possible misunderstanding about my low opinion of such delusions. |
|
07-06-2003, 01:35 AM | #40 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa Bay area
Posts: 3,471
|
Quote:
For example==I could say President George Washington, but president abraham lincoln and president george bush and that would be quite acceptable to you as my personal choice and right to do so ---Correct? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|