FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.

Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Reload this Page Apparently I'm being "irrational"
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM
Search

 
Page 4 of 11 « First 23 4 56 Last »
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-04-2002, 05:25 AM   #31
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 399
Post
Does anyone still think King Arthur is actually a non-theist?

Wasn�t Bede caught pretending to be an agnostic shortly before KA appeared on the scene? Doesn�t Bede have a history of pretending to be something he is not? Does KA act like a childish jerk because he is a venting pent-up hostilities?

Sure smells like Bede to me.
Cretinist is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 05:45 AM   #32
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Camelot
Posts: 290
Post
Moley, moley, moley!
King Arthur is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 06:02 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
Post
Quote:
Originally posted by King Arthur:
<strong>There are ancient manuscripts, called the New Testament, which say that Jesus was seen by 500 people after his resurrection. There's your proof.</strong>
Are you an inerrantist?
Jayhawker Soule is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 06:17 AM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Post
Quote:
Originally posted by Cretinist:
<strong>Does anyone still think King Arthur is actually a non-theist?

Wasn�t Bede caught pretending to be an agnostic shortly before KA appeared on the scene? Doesn�t Bede have a history of pretending to be something he is not? Does KA act like a childish jerk because he is a venting pent-up hostilities?

Sure smells like Bede to me.</strong>
It's Bede. In an early post, KA slipped and used a phrase unique to Bede. QED.
Kosh is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 06:24 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Post
Well Bede usually posts during the week and I can't recall ever seeing him post on a Sunday so for now I'll go with the hypothesis that KA is just a poor copy.

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 08:18 AM   #36
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 399
Post
Quote:
Originally posted by Kosh:
<strong>

It's Bede. In an early post, KA slipped and used a phrase unique to Bede. QED.</strong>
Also, didn't a debate or a series of debates between Vork and Bede have mentions of the historicity of King Arthur? Could have been the inspiration for Bede choosing that handle.
Cretinist is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 10:02 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Post
Quote:
Originally posted by Amen-Moses:
<strong>Well Bede usually posts during the week and I can't recall ever seeing him post on a Sunday so for now I'll go with the hypothesis that KA is just a poor copy.

Amen-Moses</strong>
My other guess would be Metcrock, since the "I'm smarter than you" attitude matches too well. But there's not statistical way he could catch all his typo's that well...
Kosh is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 10:36 AM   #38
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Camelot
Posts: 290
Post
Quote:
Originally posted by Kosh:
<strong>My other guess would be Metcrock, since the "I'm smarter than you" attitude matches too well. But there's not statistical way he could catch all his typo's that well...</strong>
ROTFLMAO!!!!

You all really didn't get my post a while back, did you?! I sent up one of my more silly posts and said something like: "Just call me Mensa Man, or perhaps kcorcateM!" It was meant to be a joke, you know, a Mensa-like puzzle... Geesh... No one said a thing, but I thought surely that someone got it.

Anyways, I'm not Bede because I would abhor having a theological debate with myself. He's bright, brighter than most here, but he ain't got nuthin' on me either. I'm not Metacrock. He was here and gone. I thought he was pretty funny. He knew a lot more than many here gave him credit for. I'm not any of the Christians. I'm an atheist who loves to play devil's advocate. I don't think religion is all bad and I don't think there is any reason to bash it and the truth as much as I see done here. You don't wanna believe me, it's up to you.

[ August 04, 2002: Message edited by: King Arthur ]</p>
King Arthur is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 10:44 AM   #39
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 399
Post
Only a Christian would defend the 500 story.
Cretinist is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 10:47 AM   #40
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Post
Quote:
Originally posted by King Arthur:
<strong>

. . . I don't think religion is all bad and I don't think there is any reason to bash it and the truth as much as I see done here. You don't wanna believe me, it's up to you.

</strong>
Referring to "the truth" is a dead give-away. Your idea of the truth is to accept every contention that Christian apologists make about their sacred texts and history.
Toto is offline  
 
Page 4 of 11 « First 23 4 56 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.