Freethought & Rationalism Archive

keyser_soze · 05-26-2003, 12:26 AM

Good reflexes. I'd wish TW to fail, but they do such a supremely good job for us of deconverting people that it would be cutting off the nose to spite the face. Yes, they are ridiculous and obnoxious, but have you ever seen an apologist do such a fine job of distancing theists from faith as safarti and turkel do? Nay, I say they must live forever, bringing us fresh bodies to build up the atheist movement!

Jayjay · 05-26-2003, 01:34 AM

It's Sarfati, S-A-R-F-A-T-I. Maybe some of you misspell his name intentionally, but surely not all of you?

keyser_soze · 05-26-2003, 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jayjay
It's Sarfati, S-A-R-F-A-T-I. Maybe some of you misspell his name intentionally, but surely not all of you?

Apologies, I left off the r. Well, in all honesty, I just never paid attention to how it was spelled, but I think I meant to put an R in there. Am I forgiven. It's just so much easier to write socrates.

pangloss · 05-26-2003, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RufusAtticus
Pangloss,

DDW would like you to produce a like to that post where Socrates posted a link to your website.

You mean, Momma Dee Dee doesn't read his posts?

http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/sho...6&pagenumber=2

He also uses my name.

This is the nail in the coffin as fpor who Socrates is really is.

For Sarfati mentioned in an email to me that he knew about my website and how else would someone get that link?

pangloss · 05-26-2003, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RufusAtticus
Oh the irony! The only one I can ever remember using name calling to prove a point was SLPx, and he got warned for it!

I have pointed out the DDW that I feel the root of the problem is that Socrates is given a lower theshold for "supporting" his comments. I suspect that in many instances in the past mods have agreed with his flames, i.e. t.o. is a gutter atheist website and a bunch of bozos, and anyone who disagrees with Soc on the bible is a "villiage atheist" or the sort.

No kidding. Momma Dee Dee wrote in a post that she feels that AiG is "too nice". Doubtless, Momma likes it when Socrates/Sarfati calls people names. He has provided bibilcal justification for doing so, so who is Dee Dee to argue with that?

pangloss · 05-26-2003, 08:22 AM

http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/sho...6&pagenumber=2

Momma says that she will need 'specific' instances in which AiG plays loose with the facts or she will shut down the thread.

I provide a documentable case - devoid of ad hominem or inflammatory speech.

It goes utterly ignored.

pangloss · 05-26-2003, 08:27 AM

Also notice that Socratism has yet to substantiate his claim that molecular phylogenetics should be ignored because, according to him, the farther back you go, certainty decreases exponentially....

keyser_soze · 05-26-2003, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by pangloss
http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/sho...6&pagenumber=2

Momma says that she will need 'specific' instances in which AiG plays loose with the facts or she will shut down the thread.

I provide a documentable case - devoid of ad hominem or inflammatory speech.

It goes utterly ignored.

You might want to copy his speech into here or it will disappear.

Joe Meert · 05-26-2003, 09:32 AM

I made a mistake even though I knew the correct spelling. Given the number of mistakes he's made regarding me, surely he can forgive my error.

Cheers

Joe Meert

Duvenoy · 05-26-2003, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Meert
I made a mistake even though I knew the correct spelling. Given the number of mistakes he's made regarding me, surely he can forgive my error.

Cheers

Joe Meert

Indeed.

Welcome to II, Joe. I think I speak for everyone when I say we're glad to see you here!

doov

05-26-2003, 01:34 AM	#212
Jayjay Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Finland Posts: 6,261	Spelling spruik It's Sarfati, S-A-R-F-A-T-I. Maybe some of you misspell his name intentionally, but surely not all of you?

05-26-2003, 08:22 AM	#216
pangloss Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2000 Posts: 1,302	more irony http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/sho...6&pagenumber=2 Momma says that she will need 'specific' instances in which AiG plays loose with the facts or she will shut down the thread. I provide a documentable case - devoid of ad hominem or inflammatory speech. It goes utterly ignored.

05-26-2003, 09:32 AM	#219
Joe Meert Veteran Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Gainesville Posts: 1,224	Sarfati I made a mistake even though I knew the correct spelling. Given the number of mistakes he's made regarding me, surely he can forgive my error. Cheers Joe Meert

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

05-26-2003, 12:26 AM	#211
keyser_soze Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: god's judge (pariah) Posts: 1,281	Good reflexes. I'd wish TW to fail, but they do such a supremely good job for us of deconverting people that it would be cutting off the nose to spite the face. Yes, they are ridiculous and obnoxious, but have you ever seen an apologist do such a fine job of distancing theists from faith as safarti and turkel do? Nay, I say they must live forever, bringing us fresh bodies to build up the atheist movement!

05-26-2003, 08:27 AM	#217
pangloss Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2000 Posts: 1,302	Also notice that Socratism has yet to substantiate his claim that molecular phylogenetics should be ignored because, according to him, the farther back you go, certainty decreases exponentially....

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.