FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 08:25 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2003, 09:46 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North America
Posts: 1,603
Default Clinton: UN approval not required

Quote:
LOS ANGELES, California (CNN) --
Former President Bill Clinton said he hopes President Bush gets the support of the United Nations before undertaking any military
action against Iraq, but he said
international law doesn't require that he do so.

In an exclusive interview Thursday on CNN's "Larry King Live," the former president said he sees a good possibility that the international community will unite to force Iraqi President Saddam Hussein to disarm.

"I still hope the United Nations can act together on this, and I still think there's a chance we can, and there's still a chance that Saddam Hussein will come to his senses and disarm," Clinton said.

He said Bush is "doing the right thing now" by gathering international support, but said he doesn't believe another U.N. resolution is needed to go to war with iraq.

"As a matter of international law, I don't think it's required," Clinton said.
//snip by leonarde//

Full story here:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/...raq/index.html

Cheers!
leonarde is offline  
Old 02-07-2003, 10:41 AM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 476
Default

This is a big surprise!
Aerion is offline  
Old 02-07-2003, 10:50 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North America
Posts: 1,603
Default

Let me guess: Clinton is part of the "religious right"!!!!
leonarde is offline  
Old 02-07-2003, 10:54 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: St Louis area
Posts: 3,458
Default

And Pat Buchanan is a left-winger because he is against war with Iraq.
MortalWombat is offline  
Old 02-07-2003, 10:57 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Aerion
This is a big surprise!
Why is it? Since when has Clinton been anything but a booster for the status quo, for big business and for US hegemony? What exactly did he ever do that was liberal or progressive?
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 02-07-2003, 11:04 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The Vine
Posts: 12,950
Default

Clinton, from the begininng, was critiqued as being a moderate republican. This is not surpising at all.

Let me guess: Clinton is part of the "religious right"!!!!

are straw men that fun to beat up?
August Spies is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.