Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-06-2003, 05:14 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
|
You did well there, Radorth, but not very well.
Some of the early settlers were religious fanatics, prepared to make an extremely hazardous ocean crossing and to settle a distant, hostile land (whose inhabitants they systematically cheated and bullied) so as to be able to follow their out-lawed beliefs and practise their out-lawed rites and rituals. Other early settlers went as indentured workers, or were criminals, or adventurers with little sense of moral responsibility. Indeed, the Americas were attractive to them because there they had a good chance of living beyond the law. Subsequently, slaves and economic migrants made up the vast bulk of those who followed the Pilgrim Fathers. “ It is populated by people who actually follow the teachings of Jesus by, for example, feeding and rebuilding former enemy states.” Teaching of Jesus to drive the native Americans from their homelands and confine them to reservations? The teaching of Jesus to drop Agent Orange on the forests of Vietnam and napalm Vietnam villages? The teaching of Jesus to nuke Nagasaki and Horishima? “American soldiers actually read the Bible, and didn't rape their women.” That’s not what I read what happened in Vietnam. Remember that patrol which kidnapped a young Vietnamese woman, took her into the mountains, raped her for days on end and then shot her? |
03-06-2003, 05:32 AM | #12 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
|
Radforth, you're an American? I'm surprised at your ignorance of what the American soldiers do. Yes, many soldiers have read the Bible, but many have not. You've been around these boards long enough to know that there are atheists "in foxholes." There are also Jews, Muslims, Taoists, agnostics, Wiccans, etc. Some of those have read the Bible, too, but weren't convinced of its supposedly divine nature.
Quote:
I won't address the other points, since others have done so already, but I had to put my 2˘ in on these items. |
|
03-06-2003, 03:42 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: las vegas, nevada
Posts: 670
|
Well I imagine that our country is a lot more religious than most other English speaking nations (well, I guess I imagine Ireland pretty pious), but I don't know of a lot of fundies frothing at the mouth everywhere. I mean, you run into them now and then, but as religious as this country generally is, I think everyone kind of keeps it to themselves more often than not. Seems like an excessively personal issue. But yeah, I guess we're in the running for most religious English speaking nation.
|
03-06-2003, 04:19 PM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,647
|
Quote:
Duck! |
|
03-11-2003, 09:55 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 712
|
Quote:
HR |
|
03-11-2003, 10:33 PM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 602
|
Re: Religious / Non religous countries
Quote:
Fiach |
|
03-11-2003, 10:52 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: southern california
Posts: 779
|
Grew up in east germany and met my first real christian at the age of 19 - but for a few months I thought he was only joking.
Until then I had mostly considered religion as a historical phenomenon. As for the US I find the level of religiousness quite annoying even here in California. It's not that christians here are untolerant - not at all, the local christians are in fact really nice. It's just the complete idiocy and incessant repetition of complete nonsense free of any coherent thought that drives me crazy sometimes, maybe especially so because I like the people I have to hear it from. |
03-12-2003, 03:33 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: North of the South Pole
Posts: 5,177
|
Quote:
If you lived in, and wanted to leave one of those countries, say 150-200 years ago, where would you prefer to go? The USA, just accross the Atlantic Ocean(a voyage of maybe 2 months- but that's just a guess on my part), is relatively rich, well developed, and has room for much more development? There was also less of a class system in the USA. Or Australia, which at the time is a collection of isolated British penal colonies, with limited opportunities apart from lots of supposedly empty land, up to 9 months away via some of the most dangerous seas in the world? And then top this off with much less freedom than the USA. I would also guess that many(most?) average Europeans of the time probably hadn't even heard of Australia. I know which one I would've chosen, if I had been in their shoes and knew about Australia, regardless of religion. And I know which one I'd prefer now, given the choice, and current circumstances. |
|
03-12-2003, 05:27 AM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, the least controversial state in the le
Posts: 8,446
|
Calm youselves, you people from over the seas...
Don't worry about my country. (I'm doing enough of that for all of us) Where Europe goes, America has always followed (eventually)
A problem we have in this country is the so called "baby boom generation"--an inordinately large group of people all born at the same time and sharing many opinions. As they represent a disproportionate part of the population, all american culture since the sixties has represented their stupid foibles. they also represent the last generation that may never have heard evolution taught in schools. Now they are old, and old people tend to be conservative and religious. Most of the "fundies" are that age or older. Shortly, they will all be dead, and, though there are too many young fundies, there will never be as many as in the boomer generation. I suspect that a similar phenomenon is taking place in other countries. There is still a significant part of the population that is religious, but they are all the old people, who will soon be gone. No problem, be patient. |
03-12-2003, 06:58 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
|
Quote:
In Germany, you have to pay an extra tax to the state if you attend church. I think this is an excellent idea Quote Sarpedon: Where Europe goes, America has always followed (eventually) You think so? The saying round here is, "When America sneezes, Britain catches cold." Of course, Britain is pretty different from the rest of Europe. TW |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|