Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-21-2002, 03:26 PM | #11 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 13,699
|
Quote:
|
|
10-21-2002, 06:32 PM | #12 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 282
|
Quote:
we will not be bullied. |
|
10-21-2002, 07:37 PM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,535
|
Quote:
Basically, he's saying the monument doesn't amount to an unconstitutional establishment of religion, because there already is a de facto establishment of religion. (We heard the same thing from defenders of "under God" in the pledge.) Toto, you've got Roy by the short hairs on "freedom of conscience." I don't imagine it means much legally, but it surely illustrate's the man's ignorance. (I'd say hypocrisy, too, but for all his faults I'm pretty sure Roy is sincere.) |
|
10-21-2002, 08:55 PM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,109
|
Quote:
I should add though that I don't anything about his religious beliefs, nor his political leaning wrt the establishment clause. Thanks to all those posting the transcripts - keep it up. SLD |
|
10-22-2002, 03:51 AM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 920B Milo Circle
Lafayette, CO
Posts: 3,515
|
There are two ways to change the Constitution. One is by amendment, and the other is by putting judges into power that will favor the desired interpretation of the law above all others.
The issue that concerns me most is that Judge Moore was popularly elected by people who knew his position on this issue. And what can be done in Alabama can be done throughout the nation -- to increasingly replace the country's stock of judges with those who think like Judge Moore. So, the more interesting question in my eyes is. "What is this case doing to Judge Moore's popularity as an elected official, and what lessons will other elected officials draw from it?" Is this a scandle that is eroding his base of support among those who elected him? Or is this helping him to build that base -- to help secure the election of more people like Judge Moore and the election at the federal level of a president and senate that will appoint people like Judge Moore? Because if the people can be convinced that the existing law is the enemy and that Moore is a hero for standing up to this enemy, then even if Moore loses this case, he would have achieved a more complete and lasting victory for his side -- for his interpretation -- of the law. |
10-22-2002, 05:35 AM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,295
|
Quote:
|
|
10-22-2002, 09:49 AM | #17 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
I fell better about Judge Thompson. Perhaps instead of a "casual friendly" conversation, he was conducting a sanity hearing on Judge Moore.
|
10-23-2002, 08:12 AM | #18 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 375
|
Judge Thompson says he'll try to rule by November 18th. Mark your calendars.
|
10-23-2002, 11:58 AM | #19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 11
|
I've been getting a kick out of this whole thing mainly because the 'commandments' they are fighting over are not the commandments SPECIFICALLY called the "ten commandments" in the Bible. Those can be found in Ex 34:17-26 with the 'official' "ten commandments" stamp given in Ex 34:28. This list of commandments is quite different from the 'popular' commandments enumerated in Ex 20 1-17. Here they are not called commandments only 'words'..."and God spake these words...". (I'm not even sure to whom he is speaking because Moses has already gone down the mountain in Ex 19:25. Just mumbling to himself I guess...). It is not even mentioned that these commandments were written in stone, they were just 'spoken'.
In Exodus chapters 21 thru 30 or so, God is giving Moses all sorts of varied laws and regulations. Finally in Ex 31:18 God gives Moses the 2 "tables of testimony (NOT commandments), tables of stone..." It is these first tables that he throws at his people for partying around the golden calf. In Ex 34:1 God tell Moses, ok, hew a couple more tables and "I will write in these tables the words that were in the first tables." Well he says He will write them but then in Ex 34:27 He tells Moses to write them. Quite the delegator, God. Moses does this over 40 days and nights (I'm not sure what he used to write them with. Certainly not his finger - no wonder it took him 40days!)without bread or water and he "..wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten commandments." (Ex 34:28) There is a footnote in the RSV that shows the word 'commandments' as coming from the hebrew for 'words'. Why they are called 'words' in Ex 20 and 'commandments' here I don't know. And what are the 'official' ten commandments here given? They are: 1) Thou shalt worship no other God. 2) Thou shalt make thee no molten gods. 3) The feast of unleavened bread shalt thou keep. 4) Six days thou shalt work, but on the seventh day thou shalt rest. 5) Thou shalt observe the feast of weeks. 6) Thrice in the year shall all your menchildren appear before the Lord God. 7) Thou shalt not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leaven. 8) Neither shall the sacrifice of the feast of the passover be left until the morning. 9) The first of the firstfruits of thy land shalt thou bring unto the house of the Lord thy God. 10) Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk. God clearly says that these were the words written on the first tables of stone in Ex 34:1. Therefore THESE are the commandments that they should be fighting over. I'm particularly fond of # 10.....that one alone will keep them out of EVERYWHERE...... |
10-23-2002, 03:04 PM | #20 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,535
|
Wow. Never heard that before.
Just one more reason Roy is a schmuck. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|