Celsus

Thank you Vork,

The Bernard Muller paper looks very promising--up to 3 distinct authors! I wish that he'd tackle some of the criticisms from those who propose a single author though. With due respect to Farrell Till, his article is a touch sloppy (Antiochus IV, not II, Nebuchadrezzar, etc.), and it's really just showing coincidences as opposed to the rather stronger stylistic and linguistic evidence for the late date (and it doesn't help me find out anything about multiple authorship). No matters.

Cheers again,
Joel

Celsus

Bumping this thread now that Bernard Muller is here. Would you be interested in sharing your views?

Cheers,
Joel

Bernard Muller

Are you talking to me?
My views are already fully expressed on my page on Daniel, and I do not have anything to add up as now.
Best Regards, Bernard