FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2002, 01:01 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,101
Post

Quote:
Perhaps the distinction is that I don't consider the events that take place after my conscious mind chooses an action as a part of my consciousness.
Well, if you define mind as only what you are consciously aware of, perhaps not. When I think of mind though, I also think of instinctual behavior that is definitely controlled by the brain subconsciously. There is still no mind outside the brain itself.

Now, when, thanks to our relatively high intelligence, we assign properties to the mind that exceed natural phenomena, I think you're in a different realm. It's like defining beauty. Surely there is a natural and neurological explanation for why we percieve certain pattern/color combinations as beatiful, but beauty as an idea is obviously not physical or a part of our being.

*shrug*
Xixax is offline  
Old 10-04-2002, 01:08 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 73
Post

Corey,

I suspect that we (some of us) are talking past one another. It might be clarifying if you would explain what you understand by the mind/body problem, so that we will all know exactly what you think has been resolved.

John galt, Jr.
John Galt, Jr. is offline  
Old 10-04-2002, 01:15 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Winter of My Discontent
Posts: 94
Post

My standard blurb regarding mind/body dualism:

Electrical activity within certain regions of the brain is correlated with, necessary for and sufficient to induce visual subjective phenomena. Therefore purely physical properties of the brain are sufficient to explain at least some aspects of consciousness. These sorts of observations are being extended into other aspects of consciousness as the state of research advances, and, thus far, there is no reason to expect that these other aspects won't be shown to be based in this same electrical activity (albeit perhaps in different brain regions).
Ought Naught is offline  
Old 10-04-2002, 02:00 PM   #14
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 368
Post

The Mind-Body duality is typically defined as having force or soul that is separate from the body; what Descartes called the conarium. If you are referring to where consciousness and/or self-awareness directly comes from, then we have different situation. However, it is still a function of the brain.

Quote:
What are you calling the mind?

Your bodies functions are beyond the realm of your awareness. So how can you that the mind and body are one?
This is fallacy. The "mind" is a colloquial and nonscientific term for what we consciously experience. Psychologists use because it is convenient and easy to communicate, more properly it is called covert behavior, because we cannot see it. Damage to the brain causes deficits in information processing and other behaviors, covert and overt. Therefore, the brain, a biological organ, is the seat of thinking.

Quote:
Remember Data from Star Trek TNG? ... But when your bodies function is beyond your understanding, control, or even awareness, I don't think you deserve the credit.
It is still ultimately controlled by the brain...we know this because brain damage impairs bodily functions. Still no mind-body problems.

You seem to be anthropomorphizing the situation unduly. I'm referring to the any duality between physical and non-physical relating to a mind separate from the body.

Quote:
If you've ever played tennis, or any competitive sport, you would know that that is not my imagination. And this isn't just from my own experience.
I downhill ski. I don't have "conversations" with my body. I can analyze after the fact and image my performance from memory, but that is remembering not conversation.

Quote:
I suspect that we (some of us) are talking past one another. It might be clarifying if you would explain what you understand by the mind/body problem, so that we will all know exactly what you think has been resolved.
That is possible. That's why I asked Abe if he was referring to the Cartesian duality.
Corey Hammer is offline  
Old 10-04-2002, 07:44 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 1,677
Post

This is, unfortunately, another area where advances in science's explanatory power have dramatically outpaced the general public's awareness of them. I blame the reluctance of many scientists these days to wade out into the swamp of ignorance and superstition, face the mud pies and farts of fundamentalists and new age mystics and do some popular educating.

There is some excellent work done in the area of documentary television. Most laypeople do not watch them. Unfortunately, our textbooks still largely teach the science's view of the world as it was known in the 60's.

In the area of brain science, I would hazard a guess that more understanding has developed in the past 20 years than in all time before hand. Virtually none of that is public knowledge. I only know what bits of it I know because I have a daughter with Tourette Syndrome and I have become fascinated with the way the brain works.

I recommend that those, who dogmatically and emotionally assert that a "mind" separate from the physical body is still necessary to explain human experience/consciousness/emotions, take the time to learn about modern brain research. I think you will be amazed. Learning about our brains is fascinating, even if you aren't "into" science in general.

Just like every other area of scientific research, more and more of the way our brains function has been explained by natural processes, leaving less and less that requires the existence of mystical or supernatural forces such as "god" or a "soul".

The only way one can, after becoming informed, still believe in a non-material "mind" is if one follows blind religious dogma. I believe that most people are simply ignorant of most scientific developments of the past 20 years.
galiel is offline  
Old 10-05-2002, 06:32 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
Question

marduck thusly spouted:
Considering that the brain is matter and thoughts/consciousness are energy, I'd also like to know how this has been 'solved"



"This is so much New Age tripe that I feel woozy. I'd like to see your supporting arguments for this. Please, published science journals only"

I don't see what "New Age" has to do with anything. What are those eeg's measuring? electrical activity, brain waves, that IS energy isn't it? How much matter is invoved in reading this, are you saying my thoughts and fantasies have mass? Please explain.

[ October 05, 2002: Message edited by: marduck ]</p>
Marduk is offline  
Old 10-05-2002, 01:38 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Winter of My Discontent
Posts: 94
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by marduck:
<strong>I don't see what "New Age" has to do with anything. What are those eeg's measuring? electrical activity, brain waves, that IS energy isn't it? How much matter is invoved in reading this, are you saying my thoughts and fantasies have mass? Please explain.</strong>
Those EEGs are measuring the flux of ions into and out of neurons. This an entirely material phenomenon, so I guess that I would say, yes, your thoughts and fantasies have mass.
Ought Naught is offline  
Old 10-05-2002, 02:18 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
Post

"Those EEGs are measuring the flux of ions into and out of neurons. This an entirely material phenomenon, so I guess that I would say, yes, your thoughts and fantasies have mass"

That would explain why my head is so much heavier in the daytime than when I'm in a deep non REM sleep at night. I try to avoid thinking about elephants and concentrate on much lighter images like flowers and such.

I dont't think we'd even be having these debates, or religion or philosophy would even exist if there wasn't a mind/body 'problem'.

[ October 05, 2002: Message edited by: marduck ]</p>
Marduk is offline  
Old 10-05-2002, 03:14 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 1,827
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by marduck:
<strong>marduck thusly spouted:
Considering that the brain is matter and thoughts/consciousness are energy, I'd also like to know how this has been 'solved"



"This is so much New Age tripe that I feel woozy. I'd like to see your supporting arguments for this. Please, published science journals only"

I don't see what "New Age" has to do with anything. What are those eeg's measuring? electrical activity, brain waves, that IS energy isn't it? How much matter is invoved in reading this, are you saying my thoughts and fantasies have mass? Please explain.

[ October 05, 2002: Message edited by: marduck ]</strong>
Yes, your thoughts and fantasies have mass. Mass is equivalent to energy. Your thoughts and fantasies are the transfers of energy via electricity and chemical reactions in your brain. So they have mass.
Feather is offline  
Old 10-05-2002, 03:21 PM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Winter of My Discontent
Posts: 94
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by marduck:
<strong>I dont't think we'd even be having these debates, or religion or philosophy would even exist if there wasn't a mind/body 'problem'.</strong>
I'm not sure that I'm getting your drift here. Care to expand that thought a bit for me?
Ought Naught is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.