FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-10-2002, 08:38 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 77
Post

Oh no! A Gnome Gap!

It's obvious Neanderthals and Homo sapiens are unrelated; no Neanderthal ever took a picture of a gnome in front of Mount Rushmore!

-Neil
NeilUnreal is offline  
Old 02-10-2002, 11:29 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Gringo:
<strong>Could it not be possible that Neandertal is ancestral to modern humans? I know the Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA is spoken for, but that is only two lines in many millions. Unless there was that much genetic drift that the two couldn't possibly produce fertile offspring, I would think there would be a high probability that we have Neandertals sitting in some of those ancestral branches.</strong>
I don't think they've isolated any Neandertal Y chromosomal DNA. If they had, then it would be extremely informative. It is very much possible that Neandertals are ancestral to us, and this is currently the subject of considerable debate. (Actually, since H.s. neandertalensis and H.s. sapeins coexisted, the question is more about interbreeding. In other words, does any Neandertal DNA exist in ourselves?) The mitochondrial DNA seems to indicate that there is no Neandertal DNA in us, but this data is inconclusive for a few reasons. First of all, mitochondrial DNA is passed down only through a maternal lineage, so it tells us nothing about the possiblities of a male Neadertal ancestor (Y chromosomes would tell us this). Secondly, there is only a handfull of mitochondrial sequences available. What they tell us is that those Neadertals likely didn't contribute any DNA to modern humans, but there could be an isolated subpopulation that did. Thirdly, even if they didn't contribute any mitochondrial DNA, they could have contributed nuclear DNA without any direct maternal ancestors. In other words, a female Neandertal could mate with a sapiens male, and have a bunch of male offspring who are our direct ancestors. There would be no mitochondrial DNA passed on, but there might be X chromosomal DNA passed on. (This is really just a reworking of #1.) Anyway, I don't know that the controversy will be settled any time soon.

theyeti
theyeti is offline  
Old 02-11-2002, 02:32 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Indus
Posts: 1,038
Post

<a href="http://www.promega.com/profiles/402/ProfilesinDNA_402_09.pdf" target="_blank">The Isolation and Identification of Neanderthal Mitochondrial ... </a>
phaedrus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:58 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.