FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-23-2003, 11:28 PM   #71
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: midwest usa
Posts: 1,203
Default Doesn't

A moon cause a tide(flood)?

Don't forget if you have 100 people in a line and tell the first person a sentence and they pass the sentence to the rest of the 99 people.

When you hear the sentence from the 100th person it is totally different.

I think the flood was due to high tide.overexaggerated.
mark9950 is offline  
Old 05-23-2003, 11:52 PM   #72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,866
Default

Quote:
"I think the flood was due to high tide.overexaggerated."
Thats an interesting theory.
SecularFuture is offline  
Old 05-24-2003, 08:06 AM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,215
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vinnie
Kosh, I am just having fun messing around. I think Hovind is an idiot and the flood is a myth. I accept a 4.6 billion year old earth, evolution and the whole nine yards. Anyone familiar with my views or my website knows this

Notice my posts as well:

I said "Calcium dating" as oposed to "carbon dating"
I said "Alfred Einstein" as opposed to "Albert Einstein"
I said Special relativity came from from Alun Guth rather than Einstein. Guth is famous for inflation

Vinnie
Hey, I bit since I didn't know you from before. Besides, as I've mentioned on other threads, I was in a churchful of people (2000 of them maybe) a few weeks ago that treated Hovind like a respected celebrity. I sat behind a very earnest family with three teens that kept rolling their eyeballs at anything Michael Shermer said and nodded, laughed and clapped at everything Hovind said. I'm still traumatized by the experience. You could've been real!
openeyes is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 05:21 PM   #74
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,866
Default

:banghead:
SecularFuture is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 07:38 PM   #75
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 246
Default

Here are some more problems with the Biblical flood story.

One thing the bible forgot to take into account is that the water dwelling creatures would not have survived the flood. Obviously god forgot that the fish and other creatures in lakes and streams need fresh water and the fish whales etc in the ocean need salt water with a certain concentration of salt. During the flood the fresh water would be too salty and the salt water would be too fresh so none of them would be able to survive. The water ecosystem would also be thrown off by all the mud etc in the water, thanks to this onlaught of rain. Also the trees and plants couldn't survive being under water for a year or so.

The Jewish calendar starts in the year 3761 b.c.e. That is the year Adam was supposed to be born. Using the the geneology in Genesis 5 you can then compute that the flood was around the year 2100 b.c.e. How can it possibly be that as recent as that the whole world was obliterated in a flood and every civililzation had to start from scratch using just Noah's three sons?
Noah's son Ham had a son named Egypt and of course he is said in Genesis 10:6 to be the ancestor of the Egyptians. So I guess they were building pyramids before the flood, then starting with one ancestor built another thriving civilization! They even say that Egypt's sons were the ancestors of other tribes. So how did Egypt the country ever get started if his sons had to leave and form their own countries?

Add to that there were supposed to be no rainbows before the flood. I've seen lots of christian websites that say it didn't need to rain before because there was some sort of water canopy above the earth that provided all the needed moisture. They also claim there were no animals that ate meat and other amazing facts. So the people in like 2200 b.c.e. got to watch lions sitting around eating grass with those big sharp teeth! One of the classic ones I've seen was that the way the animals got to Australia, South America, etc was that the continental plates moved AFTER the flood. All the continents were together until 2100 b.c.e and then the continental drift ripped them apart. That must have been a fun one to witness! There might even have been a slight earthquake during that one!

By the way... Christian fundamentalists do agree more or less when the flood occurred there will be disagreement by a few hundred years or so but they do know it happened 1656 years after the world began and that the world began around 4000 b.c.e.
Kilgore Trout is offline  
Old 05-27-2003, 11:52 PM   #76
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,866
Default

AHHH CHOO!
SecularFuture is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.