Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-25-2001, 08:51 AM | #21 | |||||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
2 a : pursuit of wisdom b : a search for a general understanding of values and reality by chiefly speculative rather than observational means c : an analysis of the grounds of and concepts expressing fundamental beliefs 3 a : a system of philosophical concepts b : a theory underlying or regarding a sphere of activity or thought <the philosophy of war> <philosophy of science> 4 a : the most general beliefs, concepts, and attitudes of an individual or group b : calmness of temper and judgment befitting a philosopher [/b][/quote] CQAS Quote:
Quote:
Namaste [This message has been edited by Waning Moon Conrad (edited May 25, 2001).] |
|||||
05-25-2001, 08:58 AM | #22 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
05-25-2001, 09:05 AM | #23 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Um, I didn't see him state that Paramahansa was not authoritative BECAUSE he was from India, so why are you specifying this is his criteria? Straw man time.. |
|
05-25-2001, 07:09 PM | #24 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Yes, Zen is your 'everyday life' as anyone who understands Zen would surely know. Alas, using an example of Nazis as you did says nothing about Zen but speaks volumes about your own lack of spirituality. namaste, 'We are undone'. Ram Dass |
|
05-25-2001, 07:12 PM | #25 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
'Our own life is the instrument with which we experiment with truth." Thich Nat Han namaste, |
|
05-25-2001, 07:15 PM | #26 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
namaste, |
|
05-25-2001, 08:15 PM | #27 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
If however, this is true and yet it still remains a valid teaching of Zen because Zen is about everyday life, then my Nazi example stands because Zen is everyday life and whatever happens in everyday life IS Zen and this necessarily includes everyday life at Auschwitz. Or did you perhaps mean to say that Zen is everyday life if you're a Zen practitioner who's practicing Zen in everyday life? Perhaps you meant to say something about the integration of spiritual practice into everyday life rather than restricting it to the shrine and cushion. If this is what you meant to say, then perhaps you could have said it a bit more clearly. If you literally meant everyday life for absolutely everyone, then the Zen with Jackboots example works simply because it does....there is no restricting Zen to a time and place that suits us because of our precious sensibilities. If Zen is absolutely every moment of everyday life for absolutely everyone, then you can't keep it out of Auschwitz, Mauthausen, Treblinka etc. Trying to, makes about as much sense as alleging the existence of an omnipresent god and then saying in the next breath that his presence does not permeate the turd you've just pumped from your bowels and flushed down the sewer. If he's omnipresent, then he's right there in the S bend as well as the jewel studded velvet blackness of deep space and the flower encrusted meadows ornamented with dancing butterflies! If Zen is everyday life every day, for everyone whether they're Zen practitioners or not then sorry but it's in the most hideous and banal places and times as well as the most peaceful and lovely. Condemning somebody as being spiritually retarded because that person points out an uncomfortable consequence of a premise or belief; can often be a manifestation of the type of opinionated political correctness that seeks to make spirituality soft and gentle, swaddled in cotton wool, always comforting, never challenging....something nice and soft and oh so safe. It is a type of moral bullying that betrays the sort of shallowness and arrogance that speaks volumes about a lack of spirituality and understanding on the part of the bully, rather than the person he attempts to make his victim. Guten aben. 'Who undoes the undoers?' -Dam Crass [This message has been edited by Waning Moon Conrad (edited May 26, 2001).] |
|
05-26-2001, 06:18 AM | #28 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
What a sorry attempt at rationalization for your lack of knowledge and poor attitude. namaste, [This message has been edited by dr wu (edited May 26, 2001).] |
|
05-26-2001, 06:44 PM | #29 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
You don't think at all, that's the point! You couldn't cope with an unfortunate consequence of your hasty platitude about Zen being everyday life, you made a smug and bullying judgment, it didn't work so now you're trying to cover it up with supercilious, self-righteous bluster in a desperate attempt to save face. What lack of knowledge are you referring to here Wu? You don't know what I know or don't know! You're really just betraying your own puerility here. As for attitude, well yours does seem rather self-righteous, puffed up with moral indignation over a thing of no consequence and just basically angry for someone who is soooooo advanced and soooooo spiritual. Why don't you cut the holier and more knowledgable than thou crap and by doing so, grow up a little? |
|
05-26-2001, 08:41 PM | #30 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
The platitude came from a zen master(Chao-Chou)...don't you look silly? I have no need to save face. Do you? No, I don't know what you know except by the posts you make. Your attitude leaves much to be desired also and I dare say your posts have contained much more anger than mine. Who's the bully here? Let's agree to disagree on this and move on. As you pointed out the path is one of equanimity, harmony and peace.... namaste, |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|