Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-16-2002, 06:32 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,427
|
That is so cool. I wanna move to England now. And I suddenly oppose Britain's adopting the Euro.
|
01-23-2002, 11:56 AM | #12 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Slight update: I've decided that childhood-description and tomb-survival scores are only relevant if someone's infancy had been described or if someone had not been buried.
This pushes Charles Darwin's score down by 1 to 7.5 |
01-23-2002, 05:11 PM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Just got a fun idea on Charles Darwin as a mythic hero; he needs some really good birth story.
The Bishop of Shrewsbury goes to a fortuneteller one day, wanting to find out what to expect in his future, and he discovers that Robert and Emma Darwin are pregnant with a boy who will grow up to work out biological evolution, complete with humanity's simian ancestry. This bishop is repulsed by the thought of it, and he hatches a plot to kill the baby Charles. Which he tries to construct very carefully, so that it will be difficult to finger him. But someone leaks the plot, and Robert and Emma visit some family friends in another town, have Charles there, and return. Those family friends then raise Charles, frustrating that bishop. Later on in life, that bishop confronts CD as he starts to work out evolution, and CD makes him look silly by quoting some of the more obviously metaphorical and scientifically-backward parts of the Bible. Interestingly, there is something like this confrontation that has been elevated to legend: the famous Huxley-Wilberforce debate. [ January 23, 2002: Message edited by: lpetrich ]</p> |
01-27-2002, 07:23 PM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 1,242
|
Quote:
Can you imagine the fuss if someone proposed putting Darwin on a US banknote? |
|
01-28-2002, 01:30 PM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Montreal, QC Canada
Posts: 876
|
The main difference is that we have historical evidence for Darwin, while none for Jesus (I don't know about the others). Even if his life seems "mythical", that's because he was a great man, not because he's fictional.
|
01-29-2002, 05:13 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 859
|
Franc, are you suggesting no historical evidence for Jesus as a prophet or all the supernatural stuff about being the son of God. I've read some threads on spark online regarding the evidence for the historical person that seem to indicate there was an identifiable Jesus, though its of course a big (and silly) step to attribute Godhood and miracles to him.
Adrian |
01-29-2002, 06:59 AM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,427
|
This isn't really what this topic is about. lpetrich isn't saying Darwin is a mythological figure; he's just comparing Darwin's life to a set of criteria for mythic figures, to see how well he fits. It's more of an intellectual game than anything else.
As for a debate about the evidence for Jesus, that probably belongs in the BC&A forum. |
01-29-2002, 07:30 AM | #18 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Montreal, QC Canada
Posts: 876
|
Quote:
That's not really the subject of this thread anyway. If you want to send me information by email though, go ahead. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|