FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-24-2003, 08:08 AM   #201
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Yet another question for R'BAC

Quote:
Originally posted by Rational BAC
Did I really say I believe God is a guy? Sorry about that. I believe very few things. And many times I carelessly use the word believe, when I really mean "I think" or " I think it is more likely that" Sorry about that. Will try to more careful in the future. I most certainly meant in that case -I thought God might be a guy.

However, I just recently watched "Dogma" on video. Neat concept of a female God there. May switch over.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

As far as whether God is spiritual or physical? Darned if I know for sure. I suppose, since God can be pretty much anything He wants to be, He could be either or both.

Anyway, next time I see Him, I'll ask Him. (hopefully not for a long, long time)
That's ok, R'BAC. Thanks for the clarification.

TW
Treacle Worshipper is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 08:21 AM   #202
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Biff the unclean
I am aware that this is the traditional Christian position…
Is it the traditional Christian position? In would seem to be more recent spin doctoring. An explanation of why no one has seen god. Just as "free will" is a recent explanation of why god never does anything.
In the bible you have a physical god showing up all the time, walking in the garden in the cool of the evening, showing Moses his neither regions, etc. And god the father being a spirit would contradict the third person of the Trinity being the spirit of god.
IIRC, the church rejected the idea of an anthropomorphic god in around the 4th century, soon after the idea had become vaguely popular. Lessee: here. The last paragraph addresses C4th anthropomorphism & its rejection by the Church Fathers. The main body of the article is a wonderful rationalisation of OT descriptions of a physical god.

TW
Treacle Worshipper is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 09:26 AM   #203
DMB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks, TW for that link. I love xian apologetics, the dirtier the better.
 
Old 07-24-2003, 11:59 PM   #204
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: midwest usa
Posts: 1,203
Default No Biff

That was jesus walking not God,wait a minute.

If that was jesus than he came to earth not once but three times.

Than we are waiting for his fouth coming.

You are right biff.
mark9950 is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 12:16 AM   #205
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

He came prematurely?

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:12 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.