FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2003, 02:27 PM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hampshire U.K.
Posts: 1,027
Default

Hello Shadowy Man

quote
So what? I have a pretty good feel for the personality of the X-Man named Wolverine, but that doesn't mean he exists outside of a comic book or a movie.


I would start worrying if he did exist outside of comic books and movies, one more fruitcake on the loose, who needs them.

Peace

Eric
Eric H is offline  
Old 02-26-2003, 03:21 PM   #72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 889
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Eric H
Hi JT

quote
God wanted to walk "in the cool of the day" in his garden but not have to do all the work it takes to maintain one. Sound like a good reason to put us all through this to you?


Not really,

I’m sure you can come up with something better. But can you come up with something that does not involve beer?

Peace

Eric
Dewar's neat, thanks. I'm not the one who needs to come up with a reason for it all. That would be you. So far you score nil.
Find me a reason in the Bible other than the one I posted and you could raise that score to...well, you can't. I'm cute but not stupid. Chapter and verse. All the verbiage doesn't change the fact that your God did this for the most trivial of reasons: he didn't want to get his hands dirty. Defend him if you can.

JT
Infidelettante is offline  
Old 02-26-2003, 08:19 PM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hiding from Julian ;)
Posts: 5,368
Default

Eric, you still haven't responded to my point.

You are saying how god would want things, and saying tha'ts how things are, therefore God must exist.


Essentially, you're saying:

1) If P, then Q
2) Q, therefore P

This is **WRONG**. P is a subset of Q; there can be Q without P without invalidating this argument form.
Corona688 is offline  
Old 02-27-2003, 02:47 AM   #74
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hampshire U.K.
Posts: 1,027
Default

Hi Corona688


Quote:
So, what's the point of this whole exercise? You are saying how god would want things, and saying tha'ts how things are, therefore God must exist.

Trying to prove God’s existence seems a futile quest, because all proof seems to stop short of being absolute.

I believe in a God, but I obviously can’t prove his existence, even to myself let alone anyone else.

My whole argument rests on if and only if there is a God.

What would be the greatest purpose to create the universe and life as we see it?

Peace

Eric
Eric H is offline  
Old 02-27-2003, 02:49 AM   #75
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hampshire U.K.
Posts: 1,027
Default

Hi Corona688

Sorry for not answering your post directly, I suppose its because when I post something, there are a number of posts in opposition. I do try and reply as best as I can but its not easy.


Quote:
But then, doesn't this then become a rather useless mental exercise of 'what if''s? What if the sky was pink with green midgets? You can assume that, and you can deduce valid consequences from it GIVEN THAT ASSUMPTION. But since the assumption has no basis in reality, neither does anything deduced from it.
quote

Skip all the ‘what ifs’.

Believing or not believing in a God or Gods is a reality

Often people can be very passionate about their beliefs, they can be a very powerful influence on what we do, so they can’t be ignored.

You could almost say that reality has nothing to do with beliefs, yet people will die for what others may say are unfounded beliefs.

We recognise the difference in the person who dies while trying to help others in some way, and the person who dies while trying to harm others.


Peace

Eric
Eric H is offline  
Old 02-27-2003, 02:51 AM   #76
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hampshire U.K.
Posts: 1,027
Default

Hello JT


Quote:
I'm cute but not stupid. Chapter and verse. All the verbiage doesn't change the fact that your God did this for the most trivial of reasons: he didn't want to get his hands dirty. Defend him if you can.

There is no defence against such reasoning, other than to say, we both see the same thing, but from a very different perspective.

Peace

Eric
Eric H is offline  
Old 02-27-2003, 04:41 AM   #77
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Eric H

I would start worrying if he did exist outside of comic books and movies, one more fruitcake on the loose, who needs them.
Replace "comic books and movies" with "the Bible" and that's exactly how I feel about God!
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 02-27-2003, 05:09 AM   #78
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio USA
Posts: 111
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Eric H




My whole argument rests on if and only if there is a God.

What would be the greatest purpose to create the universe and life as we see it?

Peace

Eric
then you are in the wrong place. you are far more likely to get the responses you want at a theist forum.

I'm sure pretty mushc everyone else would agree, you are more than welcome here, but don't expect us to adopt your belief in order to critique your sermon
Kubulai is offline  
Old 02-27-2003, 06:47 AM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hiding from Julian ;)
Posts: 5,368
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Eric H
Hi Corona688
Skip all the ‘what ifs’.
No. You made them, you answer them. Without them you have no argument.
Quote:
Believing or not believing in a God or Gods is a reality
Or, maybye it isn't. Reality has the unfortunate habit of doing whatever it sees fit, no matter WHAT anybody believes.
Quote:
Often people can be very passionate about their beliefs, they can be a very powerful influence on what we do, so they can’t be ignored.

You could almost say that reality has nothing to do with beliefs, yet people will die for what others may say are unfounded beliefs.
So what?

Quote:
We recognise the difference in the person who dies while trying to help others in some way, and the person who dies while trying to harm others.


Peace

Eric
I think you're missing the point here... you're saying that theism and atheism are binary opposites, and thus equally valid beliefs in the absence of absolute evidence. That's where your reasoning breaks down - because:

Atheism is the absence of belief in gods!

And belief, by definition, is certainty in the absence of evidence.

It takes NO belief at all to say that GODS DO NOT EXIST. Moreover, this statement is testable. If someone were to prove the existence of god, this statement would be objectively false. The inverse is not true, however, because one cannot DISprove the existence of anything. Prove I don't have invisible pink unicorn in my garage. You can't, therefore I must have one? God works on the same principle - I can't disprove he exists, so he must exist? Ludicrous~! PROVE HIM!

No matter how many times we nonbelievers show that there is literally *ZERO* objective evidence for god, though, theists will always find another excuse to say 'Oh yes he does'. The fact is, there is no rational reason for a theist to hold that position; if the theist admits this then fine, I can live with that. But when he starts trying to pawn off their delusion as reality, I get ticked.
Corona688 is offline  
Old 03-01-2003, 04:13 AM   #80
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hampshire U.K.
Posts: 1,027
Default

Hi Corona688
quote
It takes NO belief at all to say that GODS DO NOT EXIST[B]



I would say the opposite, because God might exist, you do not know for sure, so you can only believe he does not exist.


peace

Eric
Eric H is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.