FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-05-2003, 12:35 AM   #41
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 65
Default

Estrogen treatment alleviates NMDA-antagonist induced hippocampal LTP blockade and cognitive deficits in ovariectomized mice.Neurobiol Learn Mem (Neurobiology of learning and memory.) 2003 Jan; 79(1): 72-80

Hmmm.. This is an interesting article suggesting that estrogen is active at NMDA receptors...
Learn something every day. That is what I get for being out of school for a couple of years.
Dune is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 01:59 AM   #42
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC, 5th floor, on the left
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dune
That was more the question I was asking rather than what hormones are involved. I am well versed in the biochemistry of the event, I just can't see how that would relate...
So I am agreeing with you as well.
Ah, I see. But you didn't tell me what hand-wavey means, and I've just got to know.

The most recent studies on post-menopausal HRT show that women over 65 using combination estrogen-progestin suppliments were twice as likely to start showing symptoms of dementia while being treated than those taking no hormones. Prior to this smaller studies showed HRT having a positive effect on cognitive abilities. (This was all over the news, so you've likely heard it.)

The reason they started studying this in the first place was an observed decrease in cognitive abilities after menopause. If the latest study holds true (and it looks like there won't be further human studies due to increased cancer rates in HRT patients), stuffing those hormones back into women over 65 doesn't help.

This doesn't logically suggest that an increase in hormonal levels around ovulation would be suffient to cause forgetfulness within the 5 day window during which a pregnancy could result, but it does confound the older and simpler belief that a woman's hormones are good for memory, period.

The question posed by the study in the OP was:

Quote:
...if this is motivated forgetting, in that ovulation caused them, in some way, to want to become pregnant. Although that cannot be proved with the present data, it is certainly something worthy of further investigation. Could it be that, at ovulation, one's physiology and brain chemistry sabotage the desire to avoid pregnancy?
It suggests not an just increase in forgetfulness, but a specific and motivated increase. It's far more sinister than suggesting an ovulating woman might forget where she put her car keys and forget to use her diapragm and forget what she had for lunch yesterday.

The question posed by this study suggests she might remember where her car keys are and what she had for lunch, but "forget" to use her diaphragm because her hormones are telling her brain that she wants to get pregnant so that she'll subconsciously "forget" only things related to preventing pregnancy.

Progesterone would have to be taken off the list of suspects because the rise in prog levels does not occur until it's too late for a lapse in birth control to result in pregnancy.

Dal
Daleth is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 03:23 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: St Louis MO USA
Posts: 1,188
Default

Quote:
I'm not a woman, of course, but I would certainly find it hard to "forget" to use birth control, given the immense consequences of pregnancy.
Right. I couldn't imagine "forgetting" to use something like a diaphragm. If there's anything to this, it's that one forgets to have it along in purse. More likely, if there's anything to this, it's that they "forget" the desire to avoid pregnancy. And instead are overcome by an attitude of "Oh goddamn it all to hell." ("It's just this once; nothing will happen; the odds are so wayyy against it, and wouldn't we have the sweetest bay-beee...")

And in telling their stories to researchers they may (without realizing it) be lying. Preferring to blame "forgetting" rather than blame "risk-taking." (Maybe now they'll get over this, and just blame brain chemicals?)
cricket is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 10:10 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Daleth
(This was all over the news, so you've likely heard it.)
GRRR this sucks! The last two studies have been very damning to HRT - first we thought that HRT could help cardiovascular disease, then we find it might increase deep vein thromboses and stroke. Then this new dementia study.

I must point out that the media did seriously over-report the study - here is the data from JAMA:

Quote:
The Modified Mini-Mental State Exam mean total scores in both groups increased slightly over time. Women in the estrogen plus progestin broup had smaller average increases in total scores compared with women receiving placebo (P = 0.03), but these differences were not clinically important...More women in the estrogen plus progestin group had a substantial and clinically impportant decline (>=2 SDs) in Modified MMSE total score (6.7%) compared with the placebo group (4.8%).

Conclusion: Among postmenopausal women aged 65 years or older, estrogen plus progestin did not improve cognitive function when compared with placebo. While most women receiving estrogen plus progestin did not experience clinically relevant adverse effects on cognition compared with placebo, a small increased risk of clinicdally meaninfgul cognitive decline occurred in the estrogen plus progestin group.
So the risk of dementia, while it is a two-fold increase, is still a two-fold increase to a very small population to begin with. Still, how depressing - we thought this would improve cognition. Our lab conducts studies in HRT in women, and now we have to re-structure all our protocols - :banghead: :banghead: Stupid science!

Quote:
(and it looks like there won't be further human studies due to increased cancer rates in HRT patients)
No there still will be future studies - we just have to modify our protocols. I'll keep you posted.

scigirl
scigirl is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 10:25 AM   #45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the edge
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dune
tribalbeeyatch-

If that where the case, then memory would flucuate as the monthly cycle moved along and alter significantly during and after menopause.
Is that the case?
It appears to be so:
Quote:
Behav Neurosci 2001 Feb;115(1):229-37

Spatial reference memory and neocortical neurochemistry vary with the estrous cycle in C57BL/6 mice.

Frick KM, Berger-Sweeney J.

Department of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Massachusetts 02481-8203, USA.

Estrous cycle-related variations of spatial reference memory and neurochemistry in intact female mice were examined. Spatial reference memory was tested in cycling females, ovariectomized (OVX) females, and males by using a 1-day water maze protocol. Choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) activities were measured in the hippocampus and neocortex. Estrus females exhibited worse spatial acquisition and 30-min retention than did proestrus and metestrus females, higher neocortical ChAT activity than proestrus females, and higher neocortical GAD activity than OVX females and males. Neocortical, rather than hippocampal, neurochemistry was more sensitive to hormonal modulation, suggesting that hormonal mediation of neocortical function may play a critical role in regulating spatial reference memory in female mice.
It is interesting to note that the effect is more pronounced in the neocortex. This is more consistent with an effect on recall than altered hippocampal physiology and therefore more relevant to the OP.

Regarding posmenopausal memory:

Quote:
Neurobiol Learn Mem 2000 Nov;74(3):229-40

Sex differences and estropausal phase effects on water maze performance in aged rats.

Warren SG, Juraska JM.

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA.

An age-related decline in memory has been reported in male rats; however, there are few studies that have addressed these changes in aged female rats. In young female rats, hormonal cycles influence behavior. By the age of 22 months most female rats have not had regular hormonal cycles for at least 9 months. In the current study we examined how the hormonal status (persistent estrus and pseudo-pregnant) of the aged (22-24 months) female rat (Long Evans) influenced performance on a spatial version of the Morris water maze and compared this to aged male rats. Aged females in persistent estrus showed better performance on the water maze than both aged females that were pseudopregnant and aged males. Thus, postestropausal hormonal status may influence the course of aging in females.
I should also point out that these estropausal effects can be largely reversed with estrogen replacement.
tribalbeeyatch is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 10:37 AM   #46
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC, 5th floor, on the left
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by scigirl
No there still will be future studies - we just have to modify our protocols. I'll keep you posted.
Thanks for that. I'm glad to hear it. Thanks also for pointing out the "hype" level in the media reports (the articles at the NIA make it seem just as grim).

Dal
Daleth is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 10:41 AM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Default

The results in rats are not terribly surprising, since in humans it has long been known that spatial abilities, such as object rotation tasks, are subject to hormonal influences, which in part explains sex differences in spatial abilities (see, e.g., Kimura, 1999. Sex and cognition, MIT Press). Have you found any studies showing hormonal influences on 'declarative' memory?

Patrick
ps418 is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 10:44 AM   #48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the edge
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dune
Estrogen treatment alleviates NMDA-antagonist induced hippocampal LTP blockade and cognitive deficits in ovariectomized mice.Neurobiol Learn Mem (Neurobiology of learning and memory.) 2003 Jan; 79(1): 72-80

Hmmm.. This is an interesting article suggesting that estrogen is active at NMDA receptors...
Learn something every day. That is what I get for being out of school for a couple of years.
There isn't any evidence that it acts as an NMDA receptor ligand or cofactor that I know of. It is much more likely that estrogen increases either the number of NMDA receptors (I think that the expression of one of the NMDA receptor subunits is regulated by an estrogen response element) or the efficacy of NMDA-receptor-stimulated second-messenger signaling.
tribalbeeyatch is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 10:52 AM   #49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the edge
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ps418
The results in rats are not terribly surprising, since in humans it has long been known that spatial abilities, such as object rotation tasks, are subject to hormonal influences, which in part explains sex differences in spatial abilities (see, e.g., Kimura, 1999. Sex and cognition, MIT Press). Have you found any studies showing hormonal influences on 'declarative' memory?

Patrick
Off the top of my head, no. I'm not very familiar with the human literature. Are you sure that declarative memory is the most relevant to women forgetting birth control? I think that it might be better classified as a procedural memory.
tribalbeeyatch is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 05:14 AM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by tribalbeeyatch
Off the top of my head, no. I'm not very familiar with the human literature. Are you sure that declarative memory is the most relevant to women forgetting birth control? I think that it might be better classified as a procedural memory.
Actually, I would think that both types would be involved to some extent -- procedural memory in the actual motor process of taking the pill, and declarative memory of the fact or event of having taken or not taken the pill or other form of birth control, or the fact that birth control 'should' be taken before sex. But I'm interested either way, so let me know if you happen to find anything.

Patrick
ps418 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.