Bubba

The absolutely damnable thing is that they do. If they publish theological articles in thological journals the process is just as you describe. Creationists are then very interested in legitimate peer review. So in essence guys like John MacArthur, the YEC writer of Battle for The Begining, are being intellectually dishonest in the max when they say that AIG and ICR scientists are responsible accademics.

Suppose for instance Scigirl or Dr. GH were to want to publish a theological article that stated that Jesus was really a ferret and then allowed each other to read and review (and agree with each other). Legitimate peer review would have been violated and the theologians would have a legitimate case against them.

So then it works Bass Ackwards and "creation scientists" publish drivil that is even more outrageous than Jesus the Fair Furry Friendly Ferret. Somehow these guys are then supposed to be legitimate scientists??

Seems like Bubba's (and Occham's) rules of logic have just been annhilated.


Bubba

[ August 05, 2002: Message edited by: Bubba ]</p>