FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.

Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Reload this Page Attention, homosexual rights advocates
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM
Search

 
Page 14 of 43 « First 41213 14 151624 Last »
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-15-2003, 11:07 AM   #131
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default
Quote:
Originally posted by JamesKrieger
It would shed your perception. But since when does your perception equal the perception of everyone else?
Who said it did?

Quote:
I have not perceived anyone on this board as being tolerant of apologists for pedophilia.
Judging by the baseless criticism some here have hurled at me versus their willingness to let Fr. Andrew's ideas go unchallenged, I would venture to say that is a profound misperception.

Quote:
You're the only one who has this perception.
How is this significant? And if I'm the only one who has this perception, why does Dane Hall complain in his article that the cameras focus on the NAMBLA contingent in the parade? Could it be that he realizes intuitively that they are providing ammunition for "gay"-bashers?
yguy is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 11:36 AM   #132
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,490
Default
Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
Judging by the baseless criticism some here have hurled at me versus their willingness to let Fr. Andrew's ideas go unchallenged, I would venture to say that is a profound misperception.
Fr. Andrews views go unchallenged? I've seen him in some heavy debate in more than one thread.
JamesKrieger is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 11:39 AM   #133
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,490
Default
Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
How is this significant?
If you're the only one on this board who has this perception, why should everyone care what you think?

Quote:
And if I'm the only one who has this perception, why does Dane Hall complain in his article that the cameras focus on the NAMBLA contingent in the parade? Could it be that he realizes intuitively that they are providing ammunition for "gay"-bashers?
I claimed that you were the only one on this board who had this perception...not the only one on the planet.
JamesKrieger is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 11:41 AM   #134
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Default
Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
Judging by the baseless criticism some here have hurled at me versus their willingness to let Fr. Andrew's ideas go unchallenged, I would venture to say that is a profound misperception.
Please give me the link to any one of the threads where Fr. Andrew's ideas have gone unchallenged.

I must have missed those threads somehow

Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 11:50 AM   #135
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,351
Default
Quote:
Originally posted by contracycle
Why has this post been deleted? I posted a well known equivalent of yguys spurious challenge - an explanation please.

After discussing it with my fellow mods, it seems I misinterpreted your meaning behind the post. I was unaware that it was meant to be a loaded rhetorical question, and not an actual real life question. I have put the post back as before.

I apologize for misunderstanding it. No hard feelings?


Aqua-MF&P Mod
AquaVita is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 11:50 AM   #136
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default
Quote:
Originally posted by HelenM
Please give me the link to any one of the threads where Fr. Andrew's ideas have gone unchallenged.
Again, not what I said. I said there are people here who find themselves compelled to try to destroy my credibility, who somehow feel no similar compulsion to hold Fr. Andrew's feet to the fire.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 11:53 AM   #137
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default
Quote:
Originally posted by JamesKrieger
If you're the only one on this board who has this perception, why should everyone care what you think?
Not why should you, why do you.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 12:24 PM   #138
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ill
Posts: 6,577
Default
Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
Again, not what I said. I said there are people here who find themselves compelled to try to destroy my credibility, who somehow feel no similar compulsion to hold Fr. Andrew's feet to the fire.
So your complaint is that they are challenging you and not Fr. Andrew?

Well, that's the nature of a discussion board. There are no rules such as "if you challenge yguy you must also challenge Fr. Andrew".

People are free to challenge one person and not another, should they so choose.

Helen
HelenM is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 12:24 PM   #139
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
Default
Quote:
Then why did you respond to this thread?
For the same reason you started it.
Calzaer is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 12:30 PM   #140
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default
Quote:
Originally posted by HelenM
So your complaint is that they are challenging you and not Fr. Andrew?

Well, that's the nature of a discussion board. There are no rules such as "if you challenge yguy you must also challenge Fr. Andrew".

People are free to challenge one person and not another, should they so choose.
Obviously true, but again utterly beside the point. Why do they find the person who points out the insanity so much more odious than the one who is the purveyor of it?
yguy is offline  
 
Page 14 of 43 « First 41213 14 151624 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.