Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-28-2002, 09:22 AM | #71 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 42
|
Defending animal testing on moral grounds is a much more difficult task. In doing so, you place the lives of humans above that of animals. It is rationalized that the mere fact that we can ask the questions about disease processes places us above other species. I guess its up to the individual to decide.
Quote:
|
|
04-28-2002, 11:42 AM | #72 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: US
Posts: 33
|
Dr.Evil: The news story was dated April 23, 1998, I searched NEJM for the whole month of April 1998 and could not find the study they site.
I tried joining the NEJM site, but I didn’t want to spend the 20. The CNN article says the same thing and has not been retracted since 1998. It’s directly from CNN’s site. That should confirm it's validity. Quote:
<a href="http://www.cctoxconsulting.a.se/EDIT.html" target="_blank">http://www.cctoxconsulting.a.se/EDIT.html</a> <a href="http://www.estsoctox.ee/SSCT_ETS/ssct_ets.html" target="_blank">http://www.estsoctox.ee/SSCT_ETS/ssct_ets.html</a> [ April 28, 2002: Message edited by: droolian ]</p> |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|