FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

View Poll Results: Free Will
We are all in full contol of our actions 23 37.70%
Our actions are determined by physical effects beyond our control 25 40.98%
"God" is only in control of our actions 1 1.64%
Don't know 12 19.67%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2003, 05:28 PM   #21
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mexico
Posts: 27
Default

Could we all agree on a single definition of Free Will???

Free Will from determinism ?

Free Will from coersion ?

I understand free will as the ability to make available choices. This means no coersion.

The Universe is probabilistic, so any attempt to say that everything is determined or fated by the Laws of Physics (or God) is BS.

Belem
Belem is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 06:14 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
Default

Belem:

But, there is coercion.

The question is, does the coercion come from within the individual, of from without...

Keith.
Keith Russell is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 07:36 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Default Free from ourselves? - what nonsense

#439(a) - Human beings extert control over their environment through physical actions determined by mental processes. In this manner, humans display certain freedom from their external environment.

#16(c) - Human beings are unable to conscioously apprehend the mechanisms within themselves that determine the outcome of their mental activity. Hence, they are not free from the cause and effect that results in a mental decision.

#42 - Human beings can observe each other and consider their own behavior. This "mental detachment" creates an illusion of freedom of action, whereas the determinants are the processes hidden from the conscious mind (see #16(c).

Given the above, I would go for the second option in the poll "Our actions are determined by physical effects beyond our control" but modified as follows:

Our mental activity is determined by physical effects beyond our concious control.

Cheers, John
John Page is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 07:58 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
Default

John:

Your '#439(a)', #16(c), and #42--

--to what do those numbers refer?

Especially this: "Human beings are unable to conscioously apprehend the mechanisms within themselves that determine the outcome of their mental activity. Hence, they are not free from the cause and effect that results in a mental decision."

How can we consciously know that we cannot 'consciously apprehend the mechanism...that determines the outcome of...mental activity'?

Also, I would argue that even if we can and/or do consciously apprehend the mechanism, that still does not free us from the causes and effects that result in mental decisions.

Keith.
Keith Russell is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 09:43 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,322
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Keith Russell
How can we consciously know that we cannot 'consciously apprehend the mechanism...that determines the outcome of...mental activity'?
Well, most of us would agree that we cannot trace the myriad sequences of cellular events that took place in order to "set up" the thought , "I'm going to tie my shoes, now." And we know we don't know.
DRFseven is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 12:00 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
Default

DRF:

Nonsense.

If 'we cannot trace the myriad sequences of cellular events that took place in order to "set up" the thought...', then how do you know that these myriad sequences of cellular events really 'set up the thought'--in the first place?

Keith.
Keith Russell is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 05:04 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,322
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Keith Russell
DRF:

Nonsense.

If 'we cannot trace the myriad sequences of cellular events that took place in order to "set up" the thought...', then how do you know that these myriad sequences of cellular events really 'set up the thought'--in the first place?

Keith.
Because we can look at them on brain scans. Even before the advent of fMRIs, we knew that transmission of electrochemical impulses must occur in order for memory to occur, and that memory is necessary for cognition. When this process is disrupted, there is disruption in the thought processes; when this process does not occur, the throught process does not occur either.

Is it your opinion that the process of thinking occurs independently of cellular activity?
DRFseven is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 05:34 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Default Go Steelers!

Keith:

Quote:
Originally posted by Keith Russell
John:

Your '#439(a)', #16(c), and #42--

--to what do those numbers refer?
I just made them up for fun, although I would love to say I got them from the Raelian Bible.
Quote:
Originally posted by Keith Russell
Especially this: "Human beings are unable to conscioously apprehend the mechanisms within themselves that determine the outcome of their mental activity. Hence, they are not free from the cause and effect that results in a mental decision."

How can we consciously know that we cannot 'consciously apprehend the mechanism...that determines the outcome of...mental activity'?
By observing people poking around in other people's brains (not joking this time)
Quote:
Originally posted by Keith Russell
Also, I would argue that even if we can and/or do consciously apprehend the mechanism, that still does not free us from the causes and effects that result in mental decisions.
I agree and disagree. I agree in the sense that I don't believe we can alter physical happenstance (e.g. deflect bullets from their path) just by thinking.

I disagree in the sense that once we discover/apprehend a behavioral pattern we have the ability to consciously compensate for it. For example, once you figure out how the stock market works you may change your investment strategy. So might others, thus financial markets become a behavioral guessing game based on anticipating the mental activity of others (as opposed to just a study of company fundamentals).

Cheers, John
John Page is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 06:40 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Default

crocodile deathroll:
Quote:
That is quite a contradiction isn't it?
No. As far as I can tell, any variety of free will worth wanting is compatible with determinism. Yes, I am a deterministic system which is the product of myriad external events, but the important thing is that I am. I exist and am capable of making choices (identifying the available options and selecting one of them), and am thus in control of my actions. Unless you define "free will" in such a way that no sane person would want it, I have free will.
tronvillain is offline  
Old 01-06-2003, 06:55 PM   #30
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 40
Default

I am free to think
as I want too.
Some may nudge me,
and others leave me blue.
But there is only one,
who can take responsibility,
for the unexplainable action,
of the one I call me.

-Osiris
Osiris is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.