FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-07-2003, 11:06 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
Default

I did use the right words, if perhaps a little liberally, and it was no more simplistic than it had to be in this forum. Please see my post in the other thread.

Peez
Peez is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 11:11 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hobart,tasmania
Posts: 551
Default symbiosis

Try the OED next time
SULPHUR is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 12:11 PM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida US
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Peez
You can think of it as a mutualistic relationship, similar in some ways to the algae and fungi that make up lichens.

(dictionary.com)
mu·tu·al·ism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mych--lzm)
n.
An association between organisms of two different species in which each member benefits.

mutualism An interaction between two species in which both species benefit.


Why does mutualism have to imply symbiosis? I'm not sure that it does... in which case since a plant's fitness is increased by the process of artificial selection to a farmer's specification (benefit), the relationship would seem mutualistic to me.
Tara is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 12:51 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hobart,tasmania
Posts: 551
Default lichen

which word is more correct in the context of an algae,fungi relationship?
SULPHUR is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 01:01 PM   #25
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Florida US
Posts: 67
Default Re: lichen

Quote:
Originally posted by SULPHUR
which word is more correct in the context of an algae,fungi relationship?
Does it matter, really? The point was that the crop/farmer relationship is mutualistic. Why nit-pick?... he said "similar in some ways"... You must have an agenda (?).

An algae-fungi relationship is symbiotic, and therefore inherently mutualistic, no?
Tara is offline  
Old 05-08-2003, 03:46 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hobart,tasmania
Posts: 551
Default symbiosis

GO back to the original argue ments
SULPHUR is offline  
Old 05-08-2003, 12:36 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
Default

Quote:
Tara:
Why does mutualism have to imply symbiosis? I'm not sure that it does... in which case since a plant's fitness is increased by the process of artificial selection to a farmer's specification (benefit), the relationship would seem mutualistic to me.
I agree, in a general sense, and that is how I used it. However, the definition given by my biology text book gives a more restrictive definition. Bottom line: it is fine to use "mutualism" for any mutually beneficial interaction, and "symbiosis" for the same thing in popular English, but biologists use the terms more restrictively (much as they use terms like "evolution" for a more specific thing than the English word can mean).

Peez
Peez is offline  
Old 05-08-2003, 12:41 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
Default

Quote:
SULPHUR:
which word is more correct in the context of an algae,fungi relationship?
Neither term is specific to any particular group of organisms. A relationship between an alga and a fungus could be a symbiosis, mutualism, competition, parasitism, etc.

Peez
Peez is offline  
Old 05-08-2003, 01:11 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hobart,tasmania
Posts: 551
Default symbiosis

I would call it strictly symbiosis as each is entirely dependent on the other. Lichen would not survive in a harsh evironment without the ability to obtain food from two different sources. I suppose I am using the term strictly.
SULPHUR is offline  
Old 05-08-2003, 02:15 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
Default

Quote:
SULPHUR:
I would call it strictly symbiosis as each is entirely dependent on the other. Lichen would not survive in a harsh evironment without the ability to obtain food from two different sources. I suppose I am using the term strictly.
According to several biology text books which I consulted, symbiosis does not imply dependance or even mutual benefit. Thus, a lichen is a symbiosis because it is a close association, but then so is a tapeworm in your intestines. A lichen is also a mutualism, which is to say both organisms benefit from the symbiosis. Of course, this is only using the restrictive biology definitions.

Peez
Peez is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.