Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Starboy · 01-19-2003, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Amos
It is based on this that equal status is given to homosexuals and to which I have not objection except for the fact that if our sexuality is created out of the controversy between male and female the rights granted by society as a whole in effort to remove this controversy will increase the frenquency of homosexual occurances. In short, it will lead to the psychological neutering of society.

Amos, I have no objections to it either. At six billion and climbing perhaps society could use some neutering.

Starboy

01-19-2003, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Starboy
Amos, I have no objections to it either. At six billion and climbing perhaps society could use some neutering.

Starboy

Hello Starboy, yes and you have the constitutional blessing to do just that. The problem is that the rest of the world does not agree and soon you will be a minority in your own land.

Starboy · 01-19-2003, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Amos
Hello Starboy, yes and you have the constitutional blessing to do just that. The problem is that the rest of the world does not agree and soon you will be a minority in your own land.

Too late.

rdalin · 01-20-2003, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Amos
The essence of our sexuality is the inward nature of our sex. Some people call it orientation, others inclination but that is just a small part of it because our sexuality is also wherein we create life, procreate life, cocreate life, nurture love and nurture life. It is independant of existence because out of our sexuality life is created, procreated, cocreated, loved and lived. Simply put, we are sexual beings and in all aspects does our sexuality precede our existence.

The question here was why homosexuality is possible since it violates natural law in that it does not characteristically represent the physical sex. The reason why this is possible is that our sexuality is an illusion that must be created and maintained by the controversy between the opposites out of which our sex is formed. Once formed in the sex of the being our sexuality remains much larger than our physical sex wherefore homosexuals can and do have all the qualities represented by our sexuality with the only handicap that they do not represent fully their own sexual identity.

It is based on this that equal status is given to homosexuals and to which I have not objection except for the fact that if our sexuality is created out of the controversy between male and female the rights granted by society as a whole in effort to remove this controversy will increase the frenquency of homosexual occurances. In short, it will lead to the psychological neutering of society.

Okay, it's obvious you just like to make unfounded assertions, such as the one about sexuality preceding our existence. I don't know about you, but prior to my existence I was nonexistent, so I didn't have any characteristics at all then.

Your reference to natural law is nonsense.

The rest of your post doesn't mean much either. As I have suspected, you don't seem to be able to back up your positions except with vast clouds of obfuscation.

Richard

01-20-2003, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rdalin
I don't know about you, but prior to my existence I was nonexistent, so I didn't have any characteristics at all then.

That is probably true but your peculiar behavior patterns are by no means descriptive of your physical identity and is wherein you are your fathers son or else the word bastard is absurd. Closer to the truth is that you probable display family traits from more distand ancestors whom you may have never seen.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.