FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2003, 03:04 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middletown, CT
Posts: 7,333
Talking

WEll you probably mixed them up because the Mormons call themselves "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints". A crappy name, if you ask me, but there you have it.
Bumble Bee Tuna is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 03:55 AM   #32
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 318
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by CX
Read, The History and Theology of the New Testament Writings pp. 316-317 for the standard arguments.

Briefly:

1)Literary dependence on 1 Thess
2)Differing eschatology
3)Hapax Legomena

etc.
I don't have the above reference to hand, but in a quick reaction, I can see one very good reason why some might reject 1 and 2 Thess. as non-Pauline, or false. There is no mention of the cross or justification. Even more worrying for these folk, are the references to the Spirit. There is one explicit reference in 2 Thess.2:13 that implies the Spirit is the means of salvation or reconciliation with God:

"(13)But we ought always to thank God for you, brothers loved by the [Lord] {Spirit?}, because from the beginning God chose you to be [saved] {reconciled?} through the [sanctifying] {purifying?} work of the SPIRIT{.}
[, and through belief in the truth.]" - where this latter phrase has clearly been added by an editor.

Geoff
Geoff Hudson is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 08:09 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

1 Thess is Pauline.
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-05-2003, 12:22 AM   #34
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: It ALWAYS turns into a discussion about the Bible

Quote:
Originally posted by CX
If Mohammed was not truly Allah's prophet would there have been Islam? If Guatauma had not truly attained enlightenment under the Bodhi tree would there be buddism? If Joseph Smith had not truly been dictated to by the angel Moroni would there be Jehovah's Witnesses?
I'm always suspicious of people who answer questions with questions! It's a good way of avoiding the point in the first place.


malookiemaloo
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 03-05-2003, 03:27 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,708
Default

Quote:
quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
But if Jesus had not risen, would there be an orthodox or any other kind of church?

malookiemaloo


Originally posted by CX
If Mohammed was not truly Allah's prophet would there have been Islam? If Guatauma had not truly attained enlightenment under the Bodhi tree would there be buddism? If Joseph Smith had not truly been dictated to by the angel Moroni would there be Jehovah's Witnesses?

Originally posted by malookiemaloo
I'm always suspicious of people who answer questions with questions! It's a good way of avoiding the point in the first place.

malookiemaloo
You're being evasive here, malookiemaloo. CX was making a very obvious point, not avoiding it. This isn't "Jeopardy" and there aren't any hard and fast rules... I don't believe for a second that you can't 'read' the statement implied in CX's post
Javaman is offline  
Old 03-05-2003, 05:09 AM   #36
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Javaman
You're being evasive here, malookiemaloo. CX was making a very obvious point, not avoiding it. This isn't "Jeopardy" and there aren't any hard and fast rules... I don't believe for a second that you can't 'read' the statement implied in CX's post
Yes. I know and apologise.

However, Jesus's claims do merit more than being lumped together with eg. Joseph Smith. Do you not agree?


m
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 03-05-2003, 05:18 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
However, Jesus's claims do merit more than being lumped together with eg. Joseph Smith. Do you not agree?
No.

Actually, it's the reverse: Joseph Smith is clearly a real person, there is no doubt about that at all. There is plenty of documentation of his life, recorded by people who were not followers of his. I'd say his claims are worth more merit than someone who might never have existed.
Asha'man is offline  
Old 03-05-2003, 05:44 AM   #38
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Asha'man
No.

Actually, it's the reverse: Joseph Smith is clearly a real person, there is no doubt about that at all. There is plenty of documentation of his life, recorded by people who were not followers of his. I'd say his claims are worth more merit than someone who might never have existed.
Question. In 2000 years time will people still be saying that Joseph Smith was a real person?


m
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 03-05-2003, 03:24 PM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
Question. In 2000 years time will people still be saying that Joseph Smith was a real person?
It depends, do you think the state will ever destroy all birth certificates, death certificates, and drivers license records? Given the nature of government bureaucracy, I think those records will be preserved for at least 10,000 years.
Asha'man is offline  
Old 03-05-2003, 03:32 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,877
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
Question. In 2000 years time will people still be saying that Joseph Smith was a real person?


m
Quite likely, assuming enough documentation about him survives. At this point we have plenty of documentation of his existence, not just from his followers, but from contemporaries who were neutral or even hostile toward him. Also, Joseph Smith is certainly revered among Mormons, but he isn't worshipped as a god.

We do not have ANY contemporary documentation about Jesus outside what was written by his followers, with the exception of a couple of brief, controversial passages in Josephus. And if Jesus had lived ANYTHING like the life the Gospels say he did, maloo, Josephus would have had a whole heck of a lot to say about him, none of it nice.

Gregg
Gregg is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.