FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > Political Discussions, 2003-2007
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2005, 09:19 PM   #101
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,098
Default Wow

Are all the threads about the Israelis and Palestinians like this. I mean really. You guys spent alot of time arguing over the relative military might of a teenager throwing rocks compared to an israeli in a tank with or without infantry. If someone were throwing rocks at me and I was sitting in my tank I think I would laugh. If I was on the street and someone was firing their tank weapons at me I think I would run away fast or I would die. No matter what you say Lauren or how you say it a tank crew is not in danger of someone throwing rocks. Tanks are big metal things with big kickass guns right?
Ravon is offline  
Old 01-29-2005, 09:41 PM   #102
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
If there's no threat to Israeli tanks, how are the Palestinians sometimes able to kill them?
And if there is no threat to RNC conventions, then how come terrorists sometimes can get through to other targets using crowds as a distraction?

In the O'Reilly example, you claimed no threat was trying to slip through. Let's see you proof.

Your hypothetical Israeli tank situation did not contain a threat. If you think otherwise, then point it out.
Sauron is offline  
Old 01-29-2005, 10:04 PM   #103
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,098
Default smart bombs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
And where is Israel supposed to get the magic missiles that can hit exactly one person only???
That is exactly the point I want to make. Magic missles that can hit (I think we mean kill) exactly one person are to be found in the same place that suicide bombers get their explosives. No where. In fact, there is very little difference between Israeli missles and Palestinian suicide bombers aside from the method of delivery. They are both deadly. Neither one discriminates between the rich man and the poor or the good man or the bad. They both kill with equal abandon - and so why is one way of killing sanctioned and the other is terrorist. I believe they are both terrorist acts. :banghead:
Ravon is offline  
Old 01-29-2005, 10:42 PM   #104
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middletown, CT
Posts: 7,333
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
Except there wasn't a real threat trying to slip by in Washington.
So you're saying there isn't any terrorist threat to the US? That's a new claim.

Are you saying that if there were a threat, Democrat protesters should be considered terrorists like O'Reilly says?

-B
Bumble Bee Tuna is offline  
Old 01-29-2005, 10:56 PM   #105
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravon
That is exactly the point I want to make. Magic missles that can hit (I think we mean kill) exactly one person are to be found in the same place that suicide bombers get their explosives. No where. In fact, there is very little difference between Israeli missles and Palestinian suicide bombers aside from the method of delivery. They are both deadly. Neither one discriminates between the rich man and the poor or the good man or the bad. They both kill with equal abandon - and so why is one way of killing sanctioned and the other is terrorist. I believe they are both terrorist acts. :banghead:
The Israeli missile usually takes out a commander and likely a few bodyguards. The suicide bomber rarely hits any legitimate targets.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 01-29-2005, 11:18 PM   #106
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
Talking miracle of uncoordinated rock combat

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
The rock-throwing is an attempt to separate the tanks from the infantry. (Note: The rock-throwers don't know this. The rank and file don't know the true plans of the leaders over there.)

The rock-chuckers don't know their "assignment".

How they could accomplish it, when infantry hiding behind a tank is the standard position of an advancing column in the first place, must be one of those miracles of Loren-world.


This is definitely one of the top threads of all time for its category.
rlogan is offline  
Old 01-30-2005, 01:00 AM   #107
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NewØZealand
Posts: 4,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alter
First, forget history for a moment. ... now, put yourself in the shoes of the Israeli government.
What kind of misdirection is this. So you put history to one side and restate to suit your prejudice.

From 7 simple points, I encountered a rather different view, and one that tends to tie more closely to the facts that I am aware of: -

- Israel, with one of the strongest armies in the world, claims the war is defensive. Could Palestine—in one fell swoop—really bring down Israel.

- The Palestinian people are being subjected to an astonishing amount of cruelty, torture, and humiliation.

- The Jewish people have a painful history as persecuted victims. It is mind-boggling to think of a Jewish state as persecutor, but this is now clearly the case.


It's interesting how history comes along with some new old information, and from the jewishworldreview site PLOT TO KILL SIX MILLION... GERMANS, with a rather chilling end "It didn't work out," says Harmatz. "The 300 or 400 we poisoned was nothing compared with what we really wanted to do.".
James T is offline  
Old 01-30-2005, 02:42 PM   #108
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
The Israeli missile usually takes out a commander and likely a few bodyguards.
Unless it takes out a bunch of innocent kids. Or the neighbor's house. Or any of a number of other innocent bystanders.

Quote:
The suicide bomber rarely hits any legitimate targets.
On the contrary. The suicide bomber hits legitimate targets all the time. The problem is merely that you don't consider them legitimate; but since the suicide bomber is practicing asymmetrical warfare, he/she *does* consider them legitimate.
Sauron is offline  
Old 01-30-2005, 03:32 PM   #109
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron
Unless it takes out a bunch of innocent kids. Or the neighbor's house. Or any of a number of other innocent bystanders.
How many rockets go that badly astray?

Quote:
On the contrary. The suicide bomber hits legitimate targets all the time. The problem is merely that you don't consider them legitimate; but since the suicide bomber is practicing asymmetrical warfare, he/she *does* consider them legitimate.
(deleted)
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 01-30-2005, 03:36 PM   #110
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
How many rockets go that badly astray?
Enough of them do.

But since you claimed that such events never happened, you must have inventoried all such rocket launches. Let's see your data, Loren.


(deleted)

As to your question - a bad move. The fact that I understand terrorism (and can accurately describe its place in warfare) doesn't mean that I support it.

I understand and can accurately describe creationism as well - that doesn't mean that I support that, either.
Sauron is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:08 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.