Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-11-2002, 08:07 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
|
I think there is only one possible way to handle this debate: lie.
Invent studes, facts, theories. Make up entire scientists if you need someone to quote. Forge pictures using photoshop, or make your own drawings and surround them with what looks like a page from a real technical journal. After all, you will be doing it for God, no matter what the commandments state... |
11-11-2002, 08:11 AM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
Hi Meagan,
The only way for you to "win" the debate is to lie. Here are a few lies that creationists like to use. <ol type="1">[*]Evilution is not science.[*]Evilution is not christian.[*]Cell theory disproves evilution.[*]The second law of thermodynamics disproves evilution.[*]Even Darwin recanted evilution when faced with eternity in hell.[*]There are no missing links, such as a half-plant-half-dog.[*]Evilution promotes racism.[*]Millions of scientists are fighting the Darwinian Indoctrinitation even if it costs them their lives.[*]If evilution were true, why hasn't anyone collected Hovind's $250,000.[*]Were you there?[/list=a] [ November 11, 2002: Message edited by: RufusAtticus ]</p> |
11-11-2002, 08:16 AM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
|
And if you need references, just put in:
(God, personal communication). |
11-11-2002, 08:25 AM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
|
Quote:
I've had students evaluate creationist arguments before (I actually spent my weekend grading papers on the subject), but I always have them take the evolutionist side -- that's where the evidence is. I might play devil's advocate in the class and throw out some of the creationist nonsense, but I wouldn't consider asking students to endorse that crap, even for pretend. |
|
11-11-2002, 09:19 AM | #15 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 292
|
Nice post Rufus, but you forgot to mention that ALL great scientists, like Isaac Newton, were Creationists and never accepted evolution for a minute.
|
11-11-2002, 09:38 AM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,751
|
Quote:
<img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" /> Abby, read it carefully, now... |
|
11-11-2002, 09:39 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Narcisco, RRR
Posts: 527
|
Since it's an anthropology class, argue that Quetzalcoatl did it. That will piss off the actual creationists in class, who will then be forced to show why their myth is superior to yours. Voila! A session in comparative mythology, which is far more germane to an anthropology course. Unless it's a physical anthropology class, in which case pz's original objection applies.
Cheers, KC |
11-11-2002, 09:41 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
|
Quote:
Boro Nut |
|
11-11-2002, 09:51 AM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,751
|
A great many things make me think "doesn't it", actually. Twelve breasts in row, for instance.
|
11-11-2002, 10:03 AM | #20 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 417
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|