RRoman

Of course! And although not all germans are nazis, they can be expected to be disproportionally sympathetic to Nazi Terrorists!

I don't even get what you are implying here. Will immigrant Muslims seduce our daughters? Will Homosexuals raid our refrigerators? Will gender confused viri infiltrate our population base and become hostile to children? Who knows!?! Not me!!! Woo hoo!!!

MzNeko

It's funny, an awful lot of people who are so vehemently against gay marriage seem to have the oddball notion that if gay people are allowed to marry people of the same gender, then everyone will do it! Men will mostly marry men, women will mostly marry women, hardly anyone will have children and civilization will crumble!

I'm going to go out on a limb here… I'm pretty sure that the straight people will still be attracted to and marry people of the opposite sex. A wild notion, I know...

Since the gay population tends to be a fairly small percentage of the total population (10%?), I somehow doubt that being legally able to do what they've been doing anyway (living together, raising kids, etc.) will have much impact on the population levels.

If a law allowing gay marriage passed in this country tomorrow, I rather doubt that droves of straight people would run out and marry folks of the same sex just because they can. I can't help wondering about people that seem to think so…

yguy

In the case of Holland, I'm suggesting that Islamic terrorists are. In America, evangelical "gays" have already gained an amount of influence in the media disproportionate to their percentage of the general populace.

I submit that any relationship outside of traditional marriage is selfish at root, because it amounts to using another person strictly for self-gratification. The reason people don't vow to stick by each other "for better or worse" is that they want the option to bug out when things get ugly, as they almost inevitably do even in good marriages.

For about the hundredth time, it's not "gay" relationships per se, but any sexual relationship based on mutual use that is the problem. Any offspring of such a union can hardly hold the parents in high esteem. Acceptance of homosexuality is only a symptom of a more fundamental flaw in the culture.

Children do not cater to the selfishness of adults. When you have kids, you can't do what you want when you want to; and kids being necessarily selfish themselves, they demand attention which selfish people give grudgingly if at all. Far easier for such people to remain childless.

yguy

Do you want to? Of course not.

yguy

Perhaps the influx of Muslim immigrants will solve the population problem in Holland, and then it will no doubt be a European paradise, sharia law notwithstanding.

yguy

<yawn>

Bad try, dude.

Autonemesis

Good bridge, bad road, evil sewers? WTF is "moral infrastucture"?

You assume everyone will become as confused as you are. But this is just projection.

Autonemesis

But you are the only one expressing concern about people becoming confused. Everyone else is fine with it, and no one else seems to be confused.

What would a thoughtful person suppose might be the explanation for this curious circumstance? That yguy is not confused and afraid, and everyone else is? I think not.

The Other Michael

yguy

I've edited your post of earlier today, as well as the various quotes of it.

Stop being a jerk (or at least stop displaying "jerk" behavior).

Reread the MF&P forum rules, since it seems that you've forgotten them since you read them a few days ago.

Michael
MF&P Moderator (Maximus)

Autonemesis

Would you complain if we investigated whether or not your sexual relations are based on mutual use (whatever that is)? If you would, why would you expect anyone else not to object to the same inquisition? Since when is the nature of anyone else's sexual relations your business?