FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-10-2003, 06:35 PM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Vt - since you are asserting that the fetus can feel pain, you should provide some sources.

But thanks to google, I can cite these:

Fetal Pain - A Discussion

Quote:
The anti-choice concern about fetal sentience or pain is clearly a tactic to undermine public confidence in the current abortion legislation and to exploit understandable concern that the abortion procedure should not cause suffering. It is a rather disingenuous stance, as those who promote it-being opposed to abortion in principle-would not support abortion even if it were clearly established that the fetus were incapable of any awareness.

The anti-choice movement do not primarily oppose abortion on the grounds that the fetus feels pain any more than the pro-choice movement support a woman's right to abortion on the grounds that the fetus does not feel pain. Both perspectives are informed by other concerns.

However, given the claims by those who oppose abortion on principle that science supports their views, it is useful to examine the relevant research closely. Such an examination supports Sackville's assertion that before 26 weeks gestation (and arguably after this time), fetuses do not feel pain.

. . .

Many specialists believe that the final necessary stages in the experience of pain can only develop after a child has been born and it is mistaken to refer to `fetal pain' at any stage of development. Dr Fitzgerald suggests in her paper that `true pain experience' develops `postnatally along with memory, anxiety, and other cognitive brain functions'.
Summary of the report on fetal pain

Quote:
Background

An expert group, set up by the Medical Research Council, has published its report on fetal pain. The group consisted of 11 members, and included leading experts in areas ranging from paediatrics and obstetrics to basic neuroscience.

. . .

Can the fetus feel pain?

Much public concern has been raised over the possibility that a fetus can feel pain. Fetuses may appear to respond to stimuli by movement, and this has been interpreted as indicating that they are able to feel pain. This is however likely to be incorrect, as these movements are thought to be reflexes generated by the spinal cord, and not associated with conscious awareness. It would thus be a mistake to see these movements as genuine expressions of pain.

Although it is not yet possible to pinpoint a specific part of the brain, which needs to be fully mature before a fetus or infant can feel pain, it is generally accepted that awareness of pain requires the involvement of the cerebral cortex. Connections to the cortex begin to develop at about 20 weeks' gestation. At earlier stages of pregnancy, the experience of pain is not yet physiologically possible. . . .

In short, no brain, no pain.
Toto is offline  
Old 06-10-2003, 10:42 PM   #32
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC, 5th floor, on the left
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Many specialists believe that the final necessary stages in the experience of pain can only develop after a child has been born and it is mistaken to refer to `fetal pain' at any stage of development. Dr Fitzgerald suggests in her paper that `true pain experience' develops `postnatally along with memory, anxiety, and other cognitive brain functions'.
Damn, I hate arguing for the other team, but not long ago, many specialists believed (and a lot of people will still tell you, as this clip suggets) that a newborn infant can't feel pain. Nevermind the fact that children who had many blood draws when they were newborns tend to be very sensitive about having their feet touched for a long time after (blood is taken from the feet). They believed boys couldn't feel it when they were circumcised, regardless of how much they screamed, because this belief justified not using an anesthetic (which the newborn's body is too weak to handle). For some reason these little beasts who can't feel pain still scream bloody murder when hungry. How about the good old fashioned slap-a-neonate's-bottom thing... to get it crying, forcing breath... but of course it's not crying because it feels pain or anything.

It's bull. They can feel pain, and it has suited us to hide from it. They are cute and helpless and innocent, and we don't like to think we're doing things (even when necessary) that hurt them. Some have argued that the newborn doesn't actually feel pain when slapped... it's just surprised... but even if true, it assumes psychological pain (fear) is less real than physical pain.

It's obvious to anyone who spends time with newborns and who doesn't have a reason to actively hide from the truth that newborns can feel pain, pleasure, happiness, anger and fear, and since it seems rather silly to assume they develop that ability in the process of being born either naturally or by C-section, the only reasonable thing is to assume it's developed sometime before birth.

Quote:
Although it is not yet possible to pinpoint a specific part of the brain, which needs to be fully mature before a fetus or infant can feel pain, it is generally accepted that awareness of pain requires the involvement of the cerebral cortex. Connections to the cortex begin to develop at about 20 weeks' gestation. At earlier stages of pregnancy, the experience of pain is not yet physiologically possible. . . .
This is closer to the truth. Around the 24th week (if I recall correctly) the fetus will start to do things like suck its thumb... a comfort act. If it can feel comforting sensations, it can feel negative (painful) ones, or so it seems to me.

Sorry for not citing these, but I don't think I'm saying anything all that disputed, and I hope I'm clearly stating where's it's just my opinion.

Quote:
In short, no brain, no pain.
That is obviously true. If the mechanism through which we feel pain (or anything else) does not yet exist, it's not possible for the fetus to experience it.

So yeah, I'm willing to accept that late term abortion is experienced as painful by the fetus, asuming the fetus is normal and healthy. That doesn't make me happy. It's awful. I also believe it's very rare, and that it is and should be performed only when absolutely necessary.

Serious psychological problems on the part of the woman can make it necessary. If unmedicated for her problems she is a danger both to herself and the fetus, and medicating her is going to be damaging to the still developing fetus, then it is better to sacrifice one than both of them and better to abort the fetus than to knowingly cause terrible birth defects. This sort of psychological problem isn't something a woman can fake one afternoon to get a 28th week abortion done and then say, Wow! I feel better!" and go skipping home. She's going to be treated for the mental health problem, and the abortion is making her treatment possible.

I've never seen anything that would lead me to believe that most late abortions are performed on healthy women and healthy fetuses because the woman is faking mental illness. That sounds like a lot of anger looking for a place to point the blame.

Dal
Daleth is offline  
Old 06-10-2003, 11:14 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,215
Default

What Daleth said.
openeyes is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.