FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2002, 04:26 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Darwin
Posts: 1,466
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Nu Who am I?
Nu, or whoever you are
Quote:
What is thought?
Self organizing neurons
Quote:
Is what I see real?
Yes, and most of what you do not see is also real.
Unless you have been taking funny mushrooms
Quote:
What is morality?
The categorization of what is socially acceptable behavior and what is socially unacceptable behavior.
Quote:
What is death?
A law in the balance of nature
Quote:
What is life?
Complex patterns that can reproduce the same patterns of itself

CD
crocodile deathroll is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 04:40 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Arrow

Quote:
Originally posted by crocodile deathroll:
The categorization of what is socially acceptable behavior and what is socially unacceptable behavior.
Not necessarily so at all; ethics go just as well for individual behaviour - a hermit is also subject to ethics, if he/she wants to be.
Gurdur is offline  
Old 05-18-2002, 08:32 AM   #13
Synaesthesia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Ender,
Although not the be-all and end-all of mind science books, Neurophilosophy is amongst the best of the dozens of books I have read on the subject. It gives the best account of inter-theoretic reduction I have ever seen, it demonstrates that the mind's form and function is not a smooth walled mystery as essentialist and dualist philosophers like to believe and examines the necessity of multidisciplinary mind-sciences.
 
Old 05-18-2002, 05:07 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Darwin
Posts: 1,466
Post

I do find the subject of ethics very confusing. Perhaps another way of defining it is the very simplistic notion of maximizing pleasure is "good" and the supression pleasure is "bad".
But many Puritanic religions of course totally confuse the issue by renouncing any idea of hedonism, and we must live like miserable martyrs to be rightious.

CD

Quote:
Originally posted by Gurdur:
<strong>

Not necessarily so at all; ethics go just as well for individual behaviour - a hermit is also subject to ethics, if he/she wants to be.</strong>
crocodile deathroll is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.