Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-17-2003, 08:50 PM | #31 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central - New York
Posts: 4,108
|
Quote:
I am Liberal and I DO NOT have an aversion or undue suspicion of Authority. I respect Authority based on LOGIC and fully support those who are able to excercise it with restriant |
|
04-17-2003, 08:53 PM | #32 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
|
Quote:
Cheers, John |
|
04-17-2003, 08:54 PM | #33 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A world less bright without WinAce.
Posts: 7,482
|
Quote:
Hrmm....ok.... But, more importantly, the basis for the argument is still sound. Vampires also have an incredible weight of history behind them, and they certainly pass your 'irrational fantasy' test as well as xianity with its own blood-drinking motifs. Since you implicitly agreed that the argument alone (outside history): "Do X because you've nothing to lose and so much to gain" is equally valid for vampire-protection as it is for god-belief, and since vampires do carry a weight of history with them, and since they pass your "rational and non-fantastic" test as well as the bible (do we really need to drudge up every fantastic episode or will you give us a certain amount of the fantastic within the pages?) can we assume you're wearing a garlic necklace now? But I am glad that you agree, when examined as a stand-alone argument, the need to wear garlic in K's wager is as pressing as the need to believe in a god in Descartes'. Quote:
|
||
04-17-2003, 08:57 PM | #34 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
04-17-2003, 08:58 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
|
Dear John,
You are equating your choosing of a religion with your choosing the people in that religion. Choose your social club that way, not your religion. The Nazi part sucked, tho it contained some highly refined intelligent and morally good people. The Catholic Church is the most rational, internally consistent religion on the face of the earth. But 95% of Catholics and probably 99% of the Catholic hierarchy is heterodox. Ergo, don’t pick your shelter by the people huddling in it, but base your selection on the shelter itself. For religious shelter, longevity and rational consistency should be the criterion guiding that decision. Obviously, I find those things in all the things you mention, O.T. Nicene Creed etc. – Sincerely, Albert the Traditional Catholic |
04-17-2003, 09:05 PM | #36 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
|
Dear Jet.
Quote:
|
|
04-17-2003, 09:07 PM | #37 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,485
|
Quote:
Wow, I supported that statement as well as you supported yours. Let's try some more unsupported facts and figures. 100 out of 100 Catholics surveyed chose Trident and are 100% wrong about all things religious. 99.9876 percent of all evil acts ever performed were perpetrated by the Traditional Catholic Church. |
|
04-17-2003, 09:10 PM | #38 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
|
Jet says:
Quote:
Quote:
Talk about double-talk! -- Albert the Traditional Catholic |
||
04-17-2003, 09:12 PM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
|
K,
You're wasting bandwidth here. -- Albert the Traditional Catholic |
04-17-2003, 09:34 PM | #40 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
|
Dear Angrill,
As long as you really believe this: Quote:
If you honestly believe the Catholic God is a beast, He won’t act beastly towards you. The operative word is “honestly.” So I suggest you stop reading my posts as there’s a danger they may shred your last remaining pretense to honesty. – Cheers, Albert the Traditional Catholic P.S. I generally have a smile on my face when posting. Especially in so blatantly an un-serious group as this that K has necklaced together |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|