FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-2002, 03:12 PM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,834
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by trientalis:
<strong>This may be an odd question but in what way is e^iPi + 1 = 0 a "beautiful" equation? I've come across that equation before in "The Art of Mathematics" and the author's explanation didn't help. If any of the mathematically inclined out there could have a stab at explaining why the above equation is "beautiful" and not just interesting, I'd be ever so grateful.
And another thing: is the equation useful in any way, much as F = ma is useful? Is there a application for that equation? Or is it just a "beautiful" result?

Sorry to be overly, well, pathetically earnest. I'm not a mathematician but I am a lover of beauty. The beauty of mathematics is something I have yet to experience, much less understand. If you are a mathematician, I envy you for the beauty you see that I do not.

&lt;End of whine&gt;</strong>
It is beautiful because there is no good reason for e, i, and Pi to be related in such a simple way. Each of these constants arise independently in mathematics. Pi flows from the ratio of the circumfrence of a cirlce and its diameter. The number i, flows from the square root function and a gap in the number system. The number e is defined as a rate of growth which is growing at the rate of growth. Why should these numbers have a simple relationship? Yet, this equation indicates that the nubmers are in fact deeply connected in a profoundly simple way. The exact number Pi can be used to derive the exact number e and visa versa.

Beauty in mathematics is fundamentally about the existence of simple, but non-obvious relationships.
ohwilleke is offline  
Old 09-26-2002, 03:20 PM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,834
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Abacus:
<strong>Some others that really fascinate me are the Taylor series expansions of e^x, cos(x), and sin(x):

e^x = 1 + x + 1/2!*x^2 + 1/3!*x^3 + ...
cos(x) = 1 - 1/2!*x^2 + ...
sin(x) = x - 1/3!*x^3 + ...

I wish I knew how to display them with the sigma summation notation.
</strong>
Ooh! I forgot those. My signature quirk taking first year physics at a local college while I was in high school, was that I did all my calculation on a simple +, -, *, divide calculator and figured out all of the sines, cosines and exponentials in the class using a Taylor's series approximation and still managed to finish before my peers with scientific calculators. I wrote the Taylor's series on a sticker on the back of the calculator. I carried a one page photocopy of a log table to do logs.
ohwilleke is offline  
Old 09-26-2002, 03:21 PM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: California
Posts: 6,196
Post

1)The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (okay, it's a theorem, but still neat)

2)The quadratic formula. [(-b +or- sqrt(b^2-4ac)]/2a

3)C/d = pi

4)(1+x)^(1/x)= e (Euler's number) &lt;when x approaches zero)

[ September 26, 2002: Message edited by: Secular Elation ]</p>
Secular Elation is offline  
Old 09-26-2002, 07:14 PM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver City, New Mexico
Posts: 1,872
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Secular Elation:
<strong>1)The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (okay, it's a theorem, but still neat)</strong>
Its also an equation, so it definitely qualifies, imho.
wade-w is offline  
Old 09-26-2002, 07:19 PM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by ohwilleke:
<strong>

Ooh! I forgot those. My signature quirk taking first year physics at a local college while I was in high school, was that I did all my calculation on a simple +, -, *, divide calculator and figured out all of the sines, cosines and exponentials in the class using a Taylor's series approximation and still managed to finish before my peers with scientific calculators. I wrote the Taylor's series on a sticker on the back of the calculator. I carried a one page photocopy of a log table to do logs.</strong>
Awesome dude! You don't know how glad I am to hear that. When I was in college, I actually had classmates in engineering that had to use their $100+ graphing calculators to do trivial arithmetic such as 22+13. I kid you not! Bleh!
Abacus is offline  
Old 09-26-2002, 07:24 PM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
Post

Another good one is the wave equation. You can see it <a href="http://mathworld.wolfram.com/WaveEquation.html" target="_blank">here.</a>

Trying to type it out here won't do it justice. The second derivatives and the formatting just don't mix.
Abacus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.