![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,550
|
![]() Quote:
As long as your meaning is clear, it's not actually wrong. It might be ineffective or give a poor impression or something, but it's not wrong. As far as spelling, it's nothing more than a general consensus. I'd argue that those spellings are common enough that they're right. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Madrid / I am a: Lifelong atheist
Posts: 885
|
![]() Quote:
I agree that clarity is paramount and that normal construction is de facto correct. I would never criticize anyone on the internet for using an apostrophe in front of "til" or "round" because the meaning is clear and the usage is common. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wisconsin sometimes, Bryn Mawr sometimes.
Posts: 184
|
![]()
The word "till" has several different meanings, including 'to cultivate land,' 'money drawer,' and a couple others. And of course round can mean up to 13 different things. 'til and 'round are ways to convey a sense of speech in writing without causing possibly confusing and conflicting meanings.
At least, that's my opinion. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 6,004
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
|
![]() Quote:
There is no confusion involved in simply saying round as in, "He had a ring round his thumb"; for round predates around just as right predates aright, and therefore it cannot be a shortened form thereof; hence the apostrophe is superfluous. |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|