FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2003, 11:12 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,320
Default Re: Re: Re: emotional confusion

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Mary didn't marry God or have any physical relations with Him. God cast the shadow of the Holy Spirit over Her, and she was pregnant. God never even physically touched Mary.
He dillied her. That was a clear case of molestation, a physical intervention in her private parts, albeit within a consensual)(not that this excuses that Yaweh, the old cradle robber) a molestation, moreover, occuring outside the sacred bounds of marriage.

This creepy shadow stuff sounds like the mutterings of a creep.

The case is clearly a physical intervention because mary subsequently became pregnant. (Unless the pregnancy was, erm, spiritual and delusional, having no physical effect upon the woman's reproductive apparatus)

Angels dancing on the heads of pins. Normal standards neither apply to mohammad, Jesus, God, mary, ghosts and souls. They are fictions requiring, cohering no connection to reality.
ComestibleVenom is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 03:09 AM   #22
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

I agree that Jesus Christ had been an illegitimate child, whether his father had been God, Joseph, or a Roman soldier named Panthera.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 03:20 AM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default Re: Elsharmota Mary uncovered.

Quote:
Originally posted by sphinx wui
... The programme said the traditional image of Mary as a blue-eyed, blonde haired woman wearing expensive blue robes was probably wrong. ...
She would likely have looked "Jewish", but she has often been depicted in the likeness of her various followers, whoever those happen to be.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 03:35 AM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: egypt
Posts: 253
Default Jesus for me, Jesus for you, Jesus for everybody

Ipetrich wrote,
She would likely have looked "Jewish", but she has often been depicted in the likeness of her various followers, whoever those happen to be.


And the same thing also with Jesus, Egyptian Christians have their own version of him and he looks completely Egyptian in it in contrast to the “blonde version” you have in the US. Black people have their own dark version and I am wondering about the Chinese one!!! It is not about historical facts any more, it is about marketing.
sphinx wui is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 06:25 AM   #25
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by PaladInChrist
Nice...good one.
Don't go high-fiving him just yet...your book's moral code is pretty disgusting too, you know.
Daggah is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 06:27 AM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
Default

Quote:
Mary didn't marry God or have any physical relations with Him. God cast the shadow of the Holy Spirit over Her, and she was pregnant. God never even physically touched Mary.
LOL. "I did NOT have sexual relations with that woman!" - God
Daggah is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 06:41 AM   #27
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: here
Posts: 121
Default Re: Re: Re: emotional confusion

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Mary didn't marry God or have any physical relations with Him. God cast the shadow of the Holy Spirit over Her, and she was pregnant. God never even physically touched Mary.
So astoundingly bizarre. People will believe anything, ......... no words are available to describe this this this....cack!
Inconnu is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 07:34 AM   #28
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
Default Re: emotional confusion

Quote:
Originally posted by sphinx wui
emotional wrote,
ßÇä ãÍãÏ ÇÈä ÚÇåÑÉ
= Mohamed was son of a whore.


I think sincerely that you confuse Mohamed with Jesus.


I was just joking, I know Muhammad wasn't a son of a whore. Another time on these boards I wrote in Arabic kaana Muhammad ibn kalb, meaning "Muhammad was a son of a dog". Of course he wasn't literally, but I don't find much to like about Muhammad. He was the precursor of Hitler, not only in his warlike disposition and subterfuge, but also in his treatment of the Jews: he had all the Jewish tribe of Bani Quraiza murdered and thrown into a pit, just like the Nazi Einsatzgruppen did 1300 years later.
emotional is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 08:00 AM   #29
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default Re: Re: emotional confusion

Quote:
Originally posted by emotional


I was just joking, I know Muhammad wasn't a son of a whore. Another time on these boards I wrote in Arabic kaana Muhammad ibn kalb, meaning "Muhammad was a son of a dog". Of course he wasn't literally, but I don't find much to like about Muhammad. He was the precursor of Hitler, not only in his warlike disposition and subterfuge, but also in his treatment of the Jews: he had all the Jewish tribe of Bani Quraiza murdered and thrown into a pit, just like the Nazi Einsatzgruppen did 1300 years later. [/B]

THESE ARE NOT THINGS TO MOCK.

DO YOU WANT HASHEM TO MAKE FUN OF YOU ON JUDGEMENT DAY?
River is offline  
Old 06-26-2003, 10:38 AM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
Default

Muhammad had sexual relations with cows.
Calzaer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.