Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-06-2002, 10:35 AM | #71 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
|
Quote:
You do realise that energy (as we know it) is 4-dimensional? In a simlar way any hypothetical 3-dimensional object would be undetectable to 4-dimensional sensors and by extension any 5-dimensional being would most probably be oblivious to light, heat, mass or any other product of 4-dimensions that we take for granted. It may only be in theoretical fields like QM that other dimensional objects can be approached, maybe the "missing mass" could be accounted for in this way? Amen-Moses |
|
07-06-2002, 10:55 AM | #72 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Indianapolis area
Posts: 3,468
|
Gemma Therese,
To argue with atheists -- it's fun, it strengthens my faith, and frankly, an all-Williams final is boring. The problem, as many of us see it, is that you are not actually arguing with any atheists. To most of us, an argument entails presenting evidence or logical proofs in support of an assertion. You're making the assertions but failing to provide any arguments to back them. |
07-06-2002, 10:57 AM | #73 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: My own little fantasy world
Posts: 8,911
|
Quote:
Brian |
|
07-06-2002, 06:43 PM | #74 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
Amen-Moses:
Quote:
|
|
07-06-2002, 06:57 PM | #75 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
Guys, I got one simple question, where is luvluv? I don't see him responding to any of us.
|
07-06-2002, 07:07 PM | #76 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Indianapolis area
Posts: 3,468
|
It's just possible that luvluv has something more interesting to do with his weekend than try to convince us that Yahweh exists. I can't think of anything more fun than this but some people, you know?
|
07-06-2002, 09:09 PM | #77 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
In fact, it might do you some good to research the pantheon of the fertile crescent to understand exactly where hebrew mythology, and by extension Xian mythology originated. Haven't you ever wondered why the god of the hebrews in the OT changes his name a bit of the way through from [El]ohim to Yahweh [YHWH}? Haven't you ever wondered why most of the hebrew names related to god end in -el as in Rachael Michael Joel Emmanuel and lets not forget the angels Azrael Gabriel It is because El was the father god in a pantheon of gods that predate Hebrew mythology other word to search for: Asherah Heylel or Helel - literally translates as the morning star, the morning star is the one that brings the first light --- lightr bringer --- LUCIFER the only reference to Lucifer in the entire bible Isa 14:12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! [how] art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! uses the word 'heylel' 01966 heylel {hay-lale'} 1) shining one, morning star, Lucifer El is the father god he had children, dawn and dusk [Shachar and Shalim], by mating with Asherah and Rohmaya. Helel or Heylel is the son of the dawn (Shachar). YHWH - was originally a son of El, later as the he usurped the number one status, and took his mother Asherah as his wife. here is a web site full of archaelogical data concerning the beginnings of Israel, the bible etc. <a href="http://www.mystae.com/restricted/streams/thera/canaan.html" target="_blank">http://www.mystae.com/restricted/streams/thera/canaan.html</a> |
|
07-07-2002, 01:50 AM | #78 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
|
Quote:
All you have to do is find a way of measuring the height of something that has no height. To me that is inherently logially impossible but maybe you are using some other definition of logic! Amen-Moses |
|
07-07-2002, 07:02 AM | #79 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Planet Lovetron
Posts: 3,919
|
Quote:
Quote:
Uh, not much was addressed to me. For Amen Moses suppose I can see why someone could not see something with no depth, but why couldn't a being that lived in ten dimensions not be able to see beings that had depth? Perhaps four dimensions are the minimum requirement for detection? (I still don't see how this would be a problem for an Omnipotent Being.) Lady Shea Quote:
|
|||
07-07-2002, 07:14 AM | #80 |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
It doesn't matter who "claims" what luvluv...historically and culturally they are the same deity.
Please see karlydee's links or study the history of the area and its people (I like <a href="http://www.fsmitha.com)" target="_blank">http://www.fsmitha.com)</a> |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|