FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-06-2002, 10:35 AM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tronvillain:
Well, something with two dimensions has surface area, so it could potentially be visible. Now, whether it could actually be visible depends on whether that surface area is large enough and whether it can interact with visual light sufficiently.
It wouldn't matter how much area it had, without any depth it would simple not be detectable to any higher dimensional object, energy included.

You do realise that energy (as we know it) is 4-dimensional?

In a simlar way any hypothetical 3-dimensional object would be undetectable to 4-dimensional sensors and by extension any 5-dimensional being would most probably be oblivious to light, heat, mass or any other product of 4-dimensions that we take for granted.

It may only be in theoretical fields like QM that other dimensional objects can be approached, maybe the "missing mass" could be accounted for in this way?

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 07-06-2002, 10:55 AM   #72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Indianapolis area
Posts: 3,468
Post

Gemma Therese,

To argue with atheists -- it's fun, it strengthens my faith, and frankly, an all-Williams final is boring.

The problem, as many of us see it, is that you are not actually arguing with any atheists. To most of us, an argument entails presenting evidence or logical proofs in support of an assertion. You're making the assertions but failing to provide any arguments to back them.
Pomp is offline  
Old 07-06-2002, 10:57 AM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: My own little fantasy world
Posts: 8,911
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Gemma Therese:
<strong>an all-Williams final is boring.</strong>
A hearty "Amen!" to that. Hewitt is a great one to watch though.

Brian
Brian63 is offline  
Old 07-06-2002, 06:43 PM   #74
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

Amen-Moses:
Quote:
It wouldn't matter how much area it had, without any depth it would simple not be detectable to any higher dimensional object, energy included.

You do realise that energy (as we know it) is 4-dimensional?

In a simlar way any hypothetical 3-dimensional object would be undetectable to 4-dimensional sensors and by extension any 5-dimensional being would most probably be oblivious to light, heat, mass or any other product of 4-dimensions that we take for granted.

It may only be in theoretical fields like QM that other dimensional objects can be approached, maybe the "missing mass" could be accounted for in this way?
It is only your assertion that a two dimensional object could not interact with a three dimensional object. There is nothing apparently logically necessary about it.
tronvillain is offline  
Old 07-06-2002, 06:57 PM   #75
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
Post

Guys, I got one simple question, where is luvluv? I don't see him responding to any of us.
Answerer is offline  
Old 07-06-2002, 07:07 PM   #76
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Indianapolis area
Posts: 3,468
Post

It's just possible that luvluv has something more interesting to do with his weekend than try to convince us that Yahweh exists. I can't think of anything more fun than this but some people, you know?
Pomp is offline  
Old 07-06-2002, 09:09 PM   #77
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 15
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Gemma Therese:
<strong>Originally posted by LadyShea:
Gemma, Islam and Judaism both stemmed from the same desert tribe and so share the same deity historically speaking. The Muslims think Mohammed was the messiah or prophet, the Christians think Jesus was and the Jews don't think the messiah has come yet...but they all worship the same bronze age war god of their goat herding ancestors.

____

You're kidding!

Gemma Therese</strong>
no he/she is not kidding

In fact, it might do you some good to research the pantheon of the fertile crescent to understand exactly where hebrew mythology, and by extension Xian mythology originated.

Haven't you ever wondered why the god of the hebrews in the OT changes his name a bit of the way through from [El]ohim to Yahweh [YHWH}?

Haven't you ever wondered why most of the hebrew names related to god end in -el as in

Rachael
Michael
Joel
Emmanuel
and lets not forget the angels

Azrael
Gabriel

It is because El was the father god in a pantheon of gods that predate Hebrew mythology

other word to search for:

Asherah

Heylel or Helel - literally translates as the morning star, the morning star is the one that brings the first light --- lightr bringer --- LUCIFER

the only reference to Lucifer in the entire bible

Isa 14:12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! [how] art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!


uses the word 'heylel'

01966 heylel {hay-lale'}
1) shining one, morning star, Lucifer

El is the father god he had children, dawn and dusk [Shachar and Shalim], by mating with Asherah and Rohmaya.

Helel or Heylel is the son of the dawn (Shachar).

YHWH - was originally a son of El, later as the he usurped the number one status, and took his mother Asherah as his wife.


here is a web site full of archaelogical data concerning the beginnings of Israel, the bible etc.

<a href="http://www.mystae.com/restricted/streams/thera/canaan.html" target="_blank">http://www.mystae.com/restricted/streams/thera/canaan.html</a>
karlydee is offline  
Old 07-07-2002, 01:50 AM   #78
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tronvillain:
It is only your assertion that a two dimensional object could not interact with a three dimensional object. There is nothing apparently logically necessary about it.
Well if you can come up with any mechanism by which it could happen then I am all ears (or eyes in this case ). Hell if you could there might even be a nobel prize in it for you.

All you have to do is find a way of measuring the height of something that has no height. To me that is inherently logially impossible but maybe you are using some other definition of logic!

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 07-07-2002, 07:02 AM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Planet Lovetron
Posts: 3,919
Post

Quote:
Guys, I got one simple question, where is luvluv? I don't see him responding to any of us.

Quote:
It's just possible that luvluv has something more interesting to do with his weekend
Correct, Pompous. An ex-girlfriend-ish type girl and an old college buddy rolled into town on the same weekend so I was catching up with the one and entertaining the other.

Uh, not much was addressed to me. For Amen Moses suppose I can see why someone could not see something with no depth, but why couldn't a being that lived in ten dimensions not be able to see beings that had depth? Perhaps four dimensions are the minimum requirement for detection? (I still don't see how this would be a problem for an Omnipotent Being.)

Lady Shea

Quote:
Study your history, Yahweh and Allah are the same deity.
To my knowledge, only Muslims claim that Allah and Yahweh are the same deity. Exclusive Yahweh worshippers pretty much solidly deny that assertion. Although you could probably present a case for Islam as an offshot of Judaism, you could not make such a case for Christianity and Islam. Islamic beliefs contradict the major belief statement of Christianity, namely the supernatural, superhuman, quality of Christ. No resolution can be made between Christianity and Islam on that point alone. On that question, Yahweh and Allah are diametrically opposed, so they can't be the same Person.
luvluv is offline  
Old 07-07-2002, 07:14 AM   #80
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Post

It doesn't matter who "claims" what luvluv...historically and culturally they are the same deity.

Please see karlydee's links or study the history of the area and its people (I like <a href="http://www.fsmitha.com)" target="_blank">http://www.fsmitha.com)</a>
Viti is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:21 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.