Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Torben · 07-26-2003, 03:02 PM

Wouldn't it be reasonable to say that the dead ends of science are the natural constants like Planck's constant? Isn't this the final frontier?

-T

triplew00t · 07-26-2003, 07:10 PM

I think the final frontier would be either Einstein's Unified Field Theory (but an updated version to include QM, which he didnt trust), or to prove String Theory. I do not think we will ever run out of 'why' or 'how', but one of these 2 theories being proven would greatly help to tie our knowlege of all we currently know about the universe together into a neat little explanation. But that is neither here nor there for this thread.

Nero

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

07-26-2003, 03:02 PM	#21
Torben Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Denmark Posts: 22	Wouldn't it be reasonable to say that the dead ends of science are the natural constants like Planck's constant? Isn't this the final frontier? -T

07-26-2003, 07:10 PM	#22
triplew00t Regular Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: North Carolina Posts: 141	I think the final frontier would be either Einstein's Unified Field Theory (but an updated version to include QM, which he didnt trust), or to prove String Theory. I do not think we will ever run out of 'why' or 'how', but one of these 2 theories being proven would greatly help to tie our knowlege of all we currently know about the universe together into a neat little explanation. But that is neither here nor there for this thread. Nero

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.