Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-11-2002, 10:36 PM | #11 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
|
Quote:
Tell me this: what meaning was lacking for God, that he should bother creating you? What is the point for God? |
|
07-11-2002, 10:39 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
As far as living life with no belief in god, and why would a pay so much attention to that the fact that I was doing so? --- I only it do it for intellectual stimulation. I find it quite fun and entertaining to debate such matters. Is that an acceptable answer? A great majority of people on this planet DO believe in a god(s) -- it's kind of hard not to think about and debate, and STRUGGLE for a position I know to be correct. Should I just keep silent and not say anyting? debate nothing. Keep my views to myself? Besides -- what do you care that I care? What about you, here you are, looking to debate. No I don't think there is an afterlife. when you say 'higher purpose' - Higher than what? Why does there have to be a purpose to life? I exist. And I want to be happy while I'm alive. I want to exist, and be happy - and NOT at the expense of other human beings. And now that I think about it, I do serve a purpose after I die. Worm food! Worm food, plant food --fertilizer. there ya go. RedEx EDITED FOR HUMOR CONTENT [ July 11, 2002: Message edited by: Red Expendable ]</p> |
|
07-11-2002, 10:54 PM | #13 | ||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Easy Street
Posts: 736
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No, not at all. [ July 12, 2002: Message edited by: Odemus ]</p> |
||||||
07-11-2002, 11:04 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 553
|
It seems that our friend Odemus is trying to feed his argument via the concept that no absolutities hold in atheism, therefore nothing can be reasoned. It is just another form of presuppositionism.
The fact is, meaning is only derived via our own definitions. Theists would love to have meaning come from royal reprimands above (i.e. God's commandments), but all evidence really points otherwise. Saying that the atheist is dillusional because he finds meaning in happiness where he has no reason to is a really weak argument. Perhaps the way that Odemus is asking these questions shreds some light on how this entire shebang really works. That is, without some established, commonly agreed standard, there is very little that can be discussed. There really isn't any reasoning with the serial killer who believes that killing holds more meaning, if he does not accept that he does not have the right to kill via our society's laws and common sense. There really isn't any standard of "good" or "bad" without some mutual agreement on what these terms mean (is postmodern art "better" than Renassisance paintings?). Same age-old argument works on morality and the "meaning of life". Having God be the "magic bullet" whose words theists derive meaning only places the burden of meaning upon a deity; it just happens that by definition he gives meaning, which is only a circular argument anyway. |
07-11-2002, 11:09 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 759
|
Odemus,
Define 'meaning'. According to some branches of Christianity, I will end up in hell for eternity. What ultimate meaning has my existence if that is the case? I suspect that you believe (or hope, at least) that you will end up in heaven for all eternity. What ultimate meaning has your existence if that is the case? Assertions that a God and an afterlife somehow supply 'meaning' are all very well but I would like to see your reasoning on this one. I suspect that 'meaning' in this sense is actually meaningless. It is simply a word that Christians use when they really mean 'better'. In other words, 'life has meaning if there is a God' actually means 'life is better if there is a God'. In fact, I would go so far as to say - from the number of times that I have seen Christians insisting that atheists must have terrible, unfillfulled lives - that the true meaning of the phrase when used by Christians ("life has meaning if there is a God") is: "life is more bearable if there is a God because I know that death is not the end, removing that fear from my mind, and that the afterlife in Heaven will be infinitely better than this one, thus enabling me to put up with any bad stuff in this one." But I may be wrong here, so please give me your definition. I was a Christian for 12 years (June last year was my first atheist month). I have noticed no reduction in my happiness - in fact, I am a lot happier as an atheist in some ways. While I no longer have the hope of ending up in heaven, I no longer have the fear of others ending up in hell, for example. |
07-11-2002, 11:20 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 808
|
I am intrigued that theists need to think that atheists have some grand POINT to believe in.
For example, I am quite confident that there is no such thing as a POINT. The fact that we have a mind is just a big (one of many?) mistake in the history of the universe. We and our mind/brain pair are just one possible survival strategy for a bunch of amino acids which happen to be able to change over time in packets called genes transmitted via watersacks called cells. If there was a visible POINT, I would probably be a thiest or deist simply because a POINT implies a reason. and reason implies intelligence. Therefore, I think that theists are determinied to find the POINT atheists are "supposed" to have and hold it up and say "SEE, you believe in a POINT to it all, and so you also believe in a REASON for it all, and so you are also saying that there is an INTELLIGENCE behind it all." When they get the standard "No point! but we still enjoy life, since it would be stupid not too" response, they fall back on "But there is no POINT to enjoyment according to atheisim, come on, tell me what your POINT is, please?" So discussions on the POINT always end up the same. |
07-11-2002, 11:25 PM | #17 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Easy Street
Posts: 736
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
[ July 12, 2002: Message edited by: Odemus ]</p> |
|||||
07-11-2002, 11:46 PM | #18 | |||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Easy Street
Posts: 736
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||
07-11-2002, 11:48 PM | #19 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Why do you care so passionately about your disbelief?
The World Trade Center Northern Ireland Communism vs Religion The attacks on democracy in the US by Christian Fundamentalism Muslims vs. Christians in Indonesia Muslims vs. Hindus in India Christians vs. Hindus in Assam Missionaries vs. local religions Evangelicals vs. Catholics in Latin America Orthodox vs. everybody else in Russia Jews vs. Muslims in the Middle East and so on. Must I make a complete list? The older I get, the more I experience belief as a great evil, although capable of good on a local scale. Vorkosigan |
07-12-2002, 12:11 AM | #20 | |||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Easy Street
Posts: 736
|
Quote:
Pronunciation: 'mE-ni[ng] Function: noun Date: 14th century 1 a : the thing one intends to convey especially by language : PURPORT b : the thing that is conveyed especially by language : IMPORT 2 : something meant or intended : AIM <a mischievous meaning was apparent> 3 : significant quality; especially : implication of a hidden or special significance <a glance full of meaning> 4 a : the logical connotation of a word or phrase b : the logical denotation or extension of a word or phrase - meaning adjective - mean·ing·ly /-ni[ng]-lE/ adverb Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|