Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-28-2003, 05:42 PM | #31 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
|
Quote:
Joel |
|
01-28-2003, 06:07 PM | #32 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
|
Celsus,
Great Bertrand Russell quote. Damn, I love that man. Strictly in a heterosexual way of course, the way one loves football players, war heroes, and people that werent allowed to teach at the City College of New York cuz they were outspoken atheists.:notworthy :notworthy |
01-28-2003, 06:15 PM | #33 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
|
I tend to think a freethinker as someone who rejects religious dogma or someone is not a believer. Neither apply to me.
I am not a freethinker. I believe in God and thus doing so some of my opinions and views stem from my God belief. I dont think its an insult to myself to say I am not a freethinker, I'm just not. I have no problem with that. If someone tells me I am not a freethinker, I would agree due to the technical definition. I have religion in my life, I believe in God. That does not mean I dont use my brain and that does not make me less intelligent it just does not make me a "freethinker" by freethinking standards. Lets face it I am atheistically challeneged obla di obla da life goes on... |
01-28-2003, 06:34 PM | #34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The land of chain smoking, bible thumping, holy ro
Posts: 1,248
|
Well Gemma, here is a common definition for freethinker from the American Heritage dictionary:
free·think·er n. One who has rejected authority and dogma, especially in religious thinking, in favor of rational inquiry and speculation. --free“think“ing adj. & n. From The World Book Dictionary we get: freethinker, noun.a person who forms his own opinions, especially on religion, independently of authority or tradition. Historically the term is applied to a group of deists of the early 1700's and it still has the sense of agnostic, skeptic, or even atheist. And from MS Encarta we have: Freethinker, person who relies on reason to reach conclusions, especially in matters of religion. In 17th- and 18th-century England and France, the term freethinkers referred to deists-those who rejected the concept of divine revelation and the authority of a church. The freethinkers formed societies and wrote books that advocated the establishment of a religion based on the free use of reason and on the laws of nature. Irish philosopher John Toland in England and philosophers Voltaire and Jean Jacques Rousseau in France were leading freethinkers of the time. Present-day freethinker organizations include the American Rationalist Association, the Freethinkers of America, and the International Order for Ethics and Culture. So you can't be a freethinker in any traditional meaning we know of, unless you call yourself a deist. Perhaps you can find a catholic dictionary that gives you the definition you seek. But you will be unable to find a non-biased dictionary, encyclopedia or other source of reference that will do so, will you? And yes, as usual, you will not answer this post. David "God and religion, the oldest scam in history, and it still sucks them in today, so free your mind, and your body will follow!" |
01-28-2003, 07:27 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 552
|
Can one be a freethinker (free thinker) and a Christian at the same time?
|
01-28-2003, 08:06 PM | #36 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The land of chain smoking, bible thumping, holy ro
Posts: 1,248
|
Quote:
David "God and religion, the oldest scam in history, and it still sucks them in today, so free your mind, and your body will follow!" |
|
01-28-2003, 08:51 PM | #37 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
01-28-2003, 11:55 PM | #38 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,047
|
Quote:
|
|
01-29-2003, 06:54 AM | #39 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
|
Quote:
The major problem with this is that somewhere during that process, in order to accpet Christianity, they will have to accept certain dogma/beliefs/myths on the basis of tradition alone. This runs counter to the definition. My feeling is, no you couldn't be both because if you take the "dogma/belief according to tradition" out of the picture, there is no support for Christianity. |
|
01-29-2003, 08:45 AM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 891
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|