FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 08:25 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-28-2003, 10:30 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
Default

Great Nutwatch, QoS. Good (??!) to know we have some fundies to laugh at on this side of the Atlantic, too

Quote:
�Pants�? Is this some British slang or does the Creator of the universe normally address his clothing? What�s next, �Thong, that burnt offering smells great�?
"Pants" is roughly equivalent to "crap" but politer. It's been in use around five years or so. Can also be used as an adjective, as in, "What a pants car." ("Thong" is funnier, tho' )

TW
Treacle Worshipper is offline  
Old 04-28-2003, 11:10 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Aravnah Ornan
All of the Christian writings on September 11 that I've read would make great Chick tracts for atheism. This one is no exception.
It is especially curious how they seem to agree with Osama bin Laden and his fellow militant Islamists that those kamikaze hijackings are a punishment for America's sins.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 05:23 AM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 473
Default "pants"

As TW says above, the term 'pants' has been used in England as a mildly pejorative term for a few years now. However rather than being British slang I thought it originated in The Simpsons .

PS: I don't watch the programme myself; I tend to avoid any programme where everyone has a yellow head - excepting the odd Chinese film.

Dibble
Dibble Helix is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 05:50 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Default

Originally posted by Treacle Worshipper
"Pants" is roughly equivalent to "crap" but politer. It's been in use around five years or so. Can also be used as an adjective, as in, "What a pants car."

Thanks, Treacle. I get my limited knowledge of British slang from Enid Blyton and Only Fools and Horses, so this one flew right by me.
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 06:30 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
Default

Originally posted by QueenofSwords
Thanks, Treacle. I get my limited knowledge of British slang from Enid Blyton and Only Fools and Horses, so this one flew right by me.

You're welcome; I can see how Enid B & Only Fools & Horses aren't quite up with modern idiom

I think what Dibble is thinking of is the phrase "Eat my shorts". I don't recall "pants" being used in The Simpsons, and I do watch it <shrug>

TW
Treacle Worshipper is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 07:15 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA, Faith-Based States of Jesusland
Posts: 1,794
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by lpetrich
It is especially curious how they seem to agree with Osama bin Laden and his fellow militant Islamists that those kamikaze hijackings are a punishment for America's sins.
The most outlandish such claim, in my opinion, was that G-d was punishing America for being soft on homosexuals (yeah, right, if only). I asked in another forum why G-d would punish America for that particular sin, while leaving the Netherlands unscathed. None of the true believers deigned to acknowledge the question.
Aravnah Ornan is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 07:30 AM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 473
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Treacle Worshipper
I think what Dibble is thinking of is the phrase "Eat my shorts". I don't recall "pants" being used in The Simpsons, and I do watch it <shrug>

TW
Yes I think you're right, but if I only talked about things I actually know about I'd have a much smaller post count
Dibble Helix is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 07:37 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Dibble Helix
Yes I think you're right, but if I only talked about things I actually know about I'd have a much smaller post count
Me too

TW
Treacle Worshipper is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 11:18 AM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Arrow

OMG! Like did u c the prayr xchang section? they coodnt spel 2 sayv there lyves! :banghead: I left a little message of my own berating their spelling. It probably won't get posted though. It says they moderate, and offensive stuff won't get posted, but they "don't edit" requests either. Huh?

If you follow some of their drop-downs from the main page, there is a link to questions about many things. The following comes from the 'Sex' section, where the question is, "Is masturbating wrong?"
Quote:
Challenge Team: Sexual activity is meant to be an expression of love between two people. Masturbation is selfish and about gratifying personal desires, where as a lifestyle of chastity is about being able to give love, appreciation and respect. Masturbating is often done as a part of unhealthy fantasies about someone, and often linked with pornography. We need to guard against sex being reduced to a purely selfish and physical level - sex is so much more precious than that.
Right! OF course there's NO WAY this could be used as a safe alternative to sex! [/sarcasm] Geez, c'mon, with all of those raging teen hormones, couldn't it be a safe release? Besides, at least it's sex with someone you love.
Shake is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 11:31 AM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Question A few questions for QoS

[list=1][*]Where do you get your subject matter?[*]Is there an index?[*]Or some sort of archive other than on II?[*]How long does it take you to do a typical 'Nutwatch'?[*]How do you decide how much/which parts of a site to respond to?[/list=1] I was just wondering if people email you with new ideas or if you pick some of them up from people's posts here. As for the last question, I know the sites could perhaps be broken up into their own 'Nutwatch' editions if you so chose. I take it you largely stay with the main page or some such thing.
Shake is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:19 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.