Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
View Poll Results: Who is the most Ridiculous Creationist? | |||
"Dr. Dino" Kent Hovind | 121 | 90.98% | |
Thomas Barnes | 0 | 0% | |
Carl Baugh | 6 | 4.51% | |
Richard Bliss | 0 | 0% | |
Thomas Barnes | 0 | 0% | |
John Grebe | 0 | 0% | |
Don Patton | 0 | 0% | |
Kelly Segraves | 0 | 0% | |
Harold Slusher | 1 | 0.75% | |
Other | 5 | 3.76% | |
Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-14-2003, 11:34 AM | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 552
|
How sad. Hovind never did receive the 100 votes that Rufus wanted. Would two lurkers please vote for him?
|
03-14-2003, 12:13 PM | #62 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 22
|
Hovind is definitely the most ridiculous creationist. Baugh and Chick would be a close second. Really, all creationists are ridiculous.
|
03-14-2003, 12:53 PM | #63 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 552
|
Wow, Hovind went from having 98 votes to 104 in what, an hour?
|
03-14-2003, 06:50 PM | #64 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 292
|
The people at http://www.evolution-facts.org/
While I still consider Hovind to be a personal favorite of mine, none can compare to whoever made this site. Hovind contends that both evolution and Creationism are equally unscientific. While this is a stupid statement, it can't compare to the one made by the site: "Regardless of what the evolutionists may claim, Creation is not a theory; it is a proven scientific fact." |
03-15-2003, 05:03 AM | #65 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Guess I got here a little late. I voted for Hovind because if it comes down to ridiculous, 'Dr.' Dino's clown show is hard to top.
A pity Woodmorappe was absent as well as the discoverer of that rare bullfrog Rana Gishi . But none are as ridiculous as my boy Kent. He's an embarassment even to other Creationists. doov |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|