![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is the most Ridiculous Creationist? | |||
| "Dr. Dino" Kent Hovind |
|
121 | 90.98% |
| Thomas Barnes |
|
0 | 0% |
| Carl Baugh |
|
6 | 4.51% |
| Richard Bliss |
|
0 | 0% |
| Thomas Barnes |
|
0 | 0% |
| John Grebe |
|
0 | 0% |
| Don Patton |
|
0 | 0% |
| Kelly Segraves |
|
0 | 0% |
| Harold Slusher |
|
1 | 0.75% |
| Other |
|
5 | 3.76% |
| Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 552
|
How sad. Hovind never did receive the 100 votes that Rufus wanted. Would two lurkers please vote for him?
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 22
|
Hovind is definitely the most ridiculous creationist. Baugh and Chick would be a close second. Really, all creationists are ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 552
|
Wow, Hovind went from having 98 votes to 104 in what, an hour?
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 292
|
The people at http://www.evolution-facts.org/
While I still consider Hovind to be a personal favorite of mine, none can compare to whoever made this site. Hovind contends that both evolution and Creationism are equally unscientific. While this is a stupid statement, it can't compare to the one made by the site: "Regardless of what the evolutionists may claim, Creation is not a theory; it is a proven scientific fact." |
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Guess I got here a little late. I voted for Hovind because if it comes down to ridiculous, 'Dr.' Dino's clown show is hard to top.
A pity Woodmorappe was absent as well as the discoverer of that rare bullfrog Rana Gishi . But none are as ridiculous as my boy Kent. He's an embarassment even to other Creationists. doov |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|