FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-06-2003, 12:26 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,288
Arrow

Thomas Aquinas. Granted, his arguments weren't all that great, but at least he tried to argue his position logically.
Defiant Heretic is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 01:12 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mind of the Other
Posts: 886
Talking

Kierkegaard--certainly a free spirit dressed in Christian robe.
philechat is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 01:48 PM   #23
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto, eh
Posts: 42,293
Default

I respect Calvin.

He said that God, being omniscient, knows in advance who's going to heaven and hell and there's nothing anyone can do about it, so live with it.

We often use that argument when arguing with theists about the problems of omniscience and free will, and this guy accepted that it's a valid one and stood up and accepted it like a man. However weird the theory may be, he had the balls keep with it to it's logical conclusion and not pussy-foot around with any mental gymnastics to try and reconcile it with the nice, lovey-dovey God image most people try and put forth, glossing over the less rosy implications of their God myth.
Tom Sawyer is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 01:59 PM   #24
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Library
Posts: 372
Default

Siddhartha Gautama (buddha): For creating an ethical philosophy that relies upon the nature of the human condition and empathy for life as opposed to the will of some deity.

Origen of Alexandria: He merged the helenistic philosophy with christianity in an attempt to make religion rational. Later seen as a heretic.

St. Francis: How can you go wrong with a crazy animal lover in a brown robe who thought that being kind was a good thing?

Dogen: His observations on the teachings of the Buddha are just amazing to read, especially the painted rice cake one.
Entropic_Gnosis is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 02:16 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 889
Default

The Dalai Lama.
A series of pretty fundie Calvinist ministers that made up the backbone of the Dutch resistance against the nazi's.
Pope John XXXIII.
Alexander Solshenitshin.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
John Ockham (quite a surprise nobody mentioned him before ).
Fransesco d'Assisi.
Father Brown...

Defenitely not JC, can't stand him frankly.
DoubleDutchy is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 02:44 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 889
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tom Sawyer
I respect Calvin.

He said that God, being omniscient, knows in advance who's going to heaven and hell and there's nothing anyone can do about it, so live with it.

We often use that argument when arguing with theists about the problems of omniscience and free will, and this guy accepted that it's a valid one and stood up and accepted it like a man. However weird the theory may be, he had the balls keep with it to it's logical conclusion and not pussy-foot around with any mental gymnastics to try and reconcile it with the nice, lovey-dovey God image most people try and put forth, glossing over the less rosy implications of their God myth.
He had the balls to send heritics to the stake as well. Read his letters on the case of Michel de Servet, who dared to have some doubts about the biblical foundation of the Trinity doctrine. A merciless and icecold fanatic; in the horror-cabinet of history he deserves a prominent stand somewhere next to Reinhardt Heydrich.
DoubleDutchy is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 03:00 PM   #27
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: small cold water flat
Posts: 471
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by DoubleDutchy
John Ockham (quite a surprise nobody mentioned him before )
Do you mean:
William of Ockham , English Franciscan 1290 ?-1349
who did not say:
"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem."
in any extant work according to Flew .
Bluenose is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 03:21 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Durango, Colorado
Posts: 7,116
Default

Tom Sawyer -
Quote:
We often use that argument when arguing with theists about the problems of omniscience and free will, and this guy accepted that it's a valid one and stood up and accepted it like a man. However weird the theory may be, he had the balls keep with it to it's logical conclusion and not pussy-foot around with any mental gymnastics to try and reconcile it with the nice, lovey-dovey God image most people try and put forth, glossing over the less rosy implications of their God myth.
This is an interesting point... in this case I would have to say I respect his consistency ... however I still can't respect the man himself. The whole propogation of a horrifically odious mythology
as truth, and all.
christ-on-a-stick is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 03:22 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Corn rows
Posts: 4,570
Default

I'll respect the one that comes out and convinces the world of the truth.
Hubble head is offline  
Old 05-06-2003, 03:24 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 889
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Bluenose
Do you mean:
William of Ockham , English Franciscan 1290 ?-1349
who did not say:
"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem."
in any extant work according to Flew .
Shame on me, I messed up things a bit..
DoubleDutchy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.