FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-02-2003, 03:07 PM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by beejay
...

What is the state's interest in making adult incest illegal?
Is it in fact illegal? A brother and sister (e.g.) cannot marry, and in many but not all states first cousins cannot marry, but what happens behind closed doors is probably not a violation of a criminal law.

Scalia said:

Quote:
State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality and obscenity are likewise sustainable only in light of [the Georgia case's] validation of laws based on moral choices. Every single one of these laws is called into question by today's decision; the court makes no effort to cabin the scope of its decision to exclude them from its holding.''
But this was histrionics. I don't think there are any surviving laws criminalizing adultery or masturbation, e.g.
Toto is offline  
Old 07-02-2003, 03:38 PM   #32
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

It appears that there are some criminal laws. William Saletan in his Slate magazine column, reports one Tennessee case where a young woman was sentenced to prison for an incestuous relationship with her uncle that started when she was a minor. (No record of what happened to the uncle.)
Toto is offline  
Old 07-02-2003, 04:33 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
Default

The Chicken Little's of the world claim the sky is falling practically any time social progress is made. They cried doom when segragation was outlawed as I'm sure they did when women were given the right to vote and slavery was abolished. Same story different props. :banghead:

The world may very well end, but this ruling won't be the cause -- well, that is unless the doomsayers destroy the world because of the ruling...
Jewel is offline  
Old 07-02-2003, 05:55 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 2,144
Default

One argument for legally prohibiting incest between adults is essentially the same as the ban on psychologists or psychiatrists ever having sex with (even former) patients. Although it restricts a few people from having consensual sex, the nature of the relationship has such potential for manipulation that, given the proportion of the population made up of slimeballs, the frequency of ethically dubious sex would greatly exceed that of ethically irrelevant sex.

It also shows that we don't claim to be able to judge the difference. In the case of workplace sexual harassment, on the other hand, the same difficulty exists but a no-contact rule would infringe on too many consenting couples (essentially everyone who isn't engaged by the time they leave school).
never been there is offline  
Old 07-02-2003, 06:14 PM   #35
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

There is an old thread in MF&P on Incest: Culture and Socialization, although I don't think they solved the problem.
Toto is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 04:23 AM   #36
DMB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't see how bigamy or polygamy could be considered private consensual activities. Marriage (as opposed to simple cohabitation) is a matter of a public contract and as such is subject to regulation in much the same way as other kinds of contract.

In modern western society there is normally no control over ordinary fornication or adultery. You only get into trouble if you do things with an under-age or mentally incompetent person or if you go through multiple marriage ceremonies. Do there remain states in the USA where either adultery or fornication is still a crime?
 
Old 07-03-2003, 06:21 AM   #37
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 375
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Toto
There is an old thread in MF&P on Incest: Culture and Socialization, although I don't think they solved the problem.
Thanks, Toto. I guess I should have known the discussion would have taken place somewhere here.

I'll take my "if gay sex is legal, why isn't incest" discussion there if it's not already answered there...
beejay is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 11:00 AM   #38
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern Maine, USA
Posts: 220
Default

beejay,

Do you think incest should be illegal?

If so, why?
Jet Grind is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 11:42 AM   #39
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 375
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jet Grind
beejay,

Do you think incest should be illegal?

If so, why?
At this point, I'm not sure. (I haven't read the other thread.)

A month ago, I would have said "sure", without thinking about it. But after hearing the arguments that the court has said consensual, noncommercial adult sex is a privacy matter, I think probably "no".

[Not that it makes a huge difference, since the incest taboo comes from being raised together. I've heard of studies that it is the first 18 months of being raised together that solidifies this taboo, no law required.]

(And as someone asked, is it actually illegal? And have people been prosecuted recently? Internet searches for this are hard to do, because if you search for "illegal incest", can you imagine what you get?)
beejay is offline  
Old 07-03-2003, 12:17 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,295
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by beejay
And as someone asked, is it actually illegal? And have people been prosecuted recently?
It's illegal everywhere in the U.S., though what qualifies as incestuous varies somewhat from state to state. The prohibitions come in the forms of marriage laws regulating who can marry and criminal laws regulating who can have sex. Here's a pretty good general description published a little over a year ago. The article doesn't contain any information on prosecutions, though.
Stephen Maturin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.