Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-02-2003, 03:07 PM | #31 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
Scalia said: Quote:
|
||
07-02-2003, 03:38 PM | #32 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
It appears that there are some criminal laws. William Saletan in his Slate magazine column, reports one Tennessee case where a young woman was sentenced to prison for an incestuous relationship with her uncle that started when she was a minor. (No record of what happened to the uncle.)
|
07-02-2003, 04:33 PM | #33 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
|
The Chicken Little's of the world claim the sky is falling practically any time social progress is made. They cried doom when segragation was outlawed as I'm sure they did when women were given the right to vote and slavery was abolished. Same story different props. :banghead:
The world may very well end, but this ruling won't be the cause -- well, that is unless the doomsayers destroy the world because of the ruling... |
07-02-2003, 05:55 PM | #34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 2,144
|
One argument for legally prohibiting incest between adults is essentially the same as the ban on psychologists or psychiatrists ever having sex with (even former) patients. Although it restricts a few people from having consensual sex, the nature of the relationship has such potential for manipulation that, given the proportion of the population made up of slimeballs, the frequency of ethically dubious sex would greatly exceed that of ethically irrelevant sex.
It also shows that we don't claim to be able to judge the difference. In the case of workplace sexual harassment, on the other hand, the same difficulty exists but a no-contact rule would infringe on too many consenting couples (essentially everyone who isn't engaged by the time they leave school). |
07-02-2003, 06:14 PM | #35 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
There is an old thread in MF&P on Incest: Culture and Socialization, although I don't think they solved the problem.
|
07-03-2003, 04:23 AM | #36 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't see how bigamy or polygamy could be considered private consensual activities. Marriage (as opposed to simple cohabitation) is a matter of a public contract and as such is subject to regulation in much the same way as other kinds of contract.
In modern western society there is normally no control over ordinary fornication or adultery. You only get into trouble if you do things with an under-age or mentally incompetent person or if you go through multiple marriage ceremonies. Do there remain states in the USA where either adultery or fornication is still a crime? |
07-03-2003, 06:21 AM | #37 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 375
|
Quote:
I'll take my "if gay sex is legal, why isn't incest" discussion there if it's not already answered there... |
|
07-03-2003, 11:00 AM | #38 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern Maine, USA
Posts: 220
|
beejay,
Do you think incest should be illegal? If so, why? |
07-03-2003, 11:42 AM | #39 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 375
|
Quote:
A month ago, I would have said "sure", without thinking about it. But after hearing the arguments that the court has said consensual, noncommercial adult sex is a privacy matter, I think probably "no". [Not that it makes a huge difference, since the incest taboo comes from being raised together. I've heard of studies that it is the first 18 months of being raised together that solidifies this taboo, no law required.] (And as someone asked, is it actually illegal? And have people been prosecuted recently? Internet searches for this are hard to do, because if you search for "illegal incest", can you imagine what you get?) |
|
07-03-2003, 12:17 PM | #40 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,295
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|