FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-17-2002, 07:38 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Post

So Amos, assuming I understand (a dubious proposition), if I died an atheist tomorrow, God would need to implant into my mind/soul/whatever 1) the true knowledge that God exists; 2) the knowledge that my afterlife sans God will be inescapably less fulfilling than said afterlife with God. Is this accurate?
Philosoft is offline  
Old 09-17-2002, 07:45 PM   #12
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

So Jobar, the only reason why we, as humans, do not have a free will is because of our ego identity wherein we think we exist. Our ego identity is our persona (mask) wherein we pretend to be something, or somebody other than who we really are. Our soul is our "woman identity" and our ego is our "human identity." In our volition will we are divided between these two identities with our womanity being more submissive but ever persitent.

Our womanity (soul) is the Alpha with which we began our journey of life already from within the womb of man. To this we add our daily rounds of samsara (or daily masses) and if we do come full cirlce in our journey of life we will end up in the Omega and will know and understand everything in between the Alpha and Omega. Our Alpha is our intuition or memory of our soul (Alpha, womanity and soul is the same thing).

So what is left for us beside being God? Our personality is needed to give character to God because if I am God without me God could no longer be.

[ September 17, 2002: Message edited by: Amos ]</p>
 
Old 09-17-2002, 07:52 PM   #13
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Philosoft:
<strong>So Amos, assuming I understand (a dubious proposition), if I died an atheist tomorrow, God would need to implant into my mind/soul/whatever 1) the true knowledge that God exists; 2) the knowledge that my afterlife sans God will be inescapably less fulfilling than said afterlife with God. Is this accurate?</strong>
If you died tomorrow they would arrange for a funeral and that would be the end for you.

If somebody who claims to be a Christian would die tomorrow the same thing would happen to that person.

Our God is the God of the living and not of the dead.
 
Old 09-17-2002, 07:54 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos:
<strong>

If you died tomorrow they would arrange for a funeral and that would be the end for you.

If somebody who claims to be a Christian would die tomorrow the same thing would happen to that person.

Our God is the God of the living and not of the dead.</strong>
Um, how can I have a "state of mind" if I have no mind?
Philosoft is offline  
Old 09-17-2002, 07:59 PM   #15
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Philosoft:
<strong>

Um, how can I have a "state of mind" if I have no mind?</strong>
You have to be alive to have a state of mind. By state of mind I mean that we must have a conceptual understanding of things.
 
Old 09-18-2002, 07:23 PM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 163
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Philosoft:
<strong>

Again, I ask how this scenario differs from what I experience now? Am I relating to God but just don't know it?</strong>
Kind of. Because your existence is temporal, you can only experience God limitedly. Existing itself is experiencing God, although all things experience him in different gradient.
Ron Singh is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 07:42 PM   #17
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Philosoft:
<strong>

Again, I ask how this scenario differs from what I experience now? Am I relating to God but just don't know it?</strong>
The difference is in the understanding of who you are. In your left brain you are temporal and therefore limited in your knowledge of God while in your right brain you are eternal and therefore God. To "know thyself" is to know God--or have the mind of God which is our mandate in the bible.

In the strict definition all Christian should have the mind of God.
 
Old 09-18-2002, 07:52 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Ron Singh:
<strong>

Because your existence is temporal, you can only experience God limitedly.</strong>
I presume your implication is that I can experience God unlimitedly once my existence is non-temporal?

<strong>
Quote:
Existing itself is experiencing God, although all things experience him in different gradient.</strong>
Your playing fast-and-loose with definitions is making my head hurt. So, rather than consciously experience God as an entity, I experience God as fundamentally equivalent to existence, in spite of my claims to the contrary? How would I distinguish God in this way from no-God?
Philosoft is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 07:55 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos:
<strong>

The difference is in the understanding of who you are. In your left brain you are temporal and therefore limited in your knowledge of God while in your right brain you are eternal and therefore God.</strong>
You really should stick to mysticism, Amos. Metaphysics and science don't combine very well.

<strong>
Quote:
To "know thyself" is to know God--or have the mind of God which is our mandate in the bible.

In the strict definition all Christian should have the mind of God.</strong>
Right. Now what does this all have to do with whether I will know the difference between experiencing and not experiencing God.
Philosoft is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 08:47 PM   #20
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Philosoft:
<strong>

Right. Now what does this all have to do with whether I will know the difference between experiencing and not experiencing God.</strong>
Well if you would ask a medical student to examine "The creation of Adam" by Michelangelo he would tell you that the backdrop of the painting is the human skull and the rest shows the intricate details within the human skull. Adam was painted outside of this backdrop and maybe that is why you don't seem to know who is pulling the strings in your life.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:00 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.