FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-24-2003, 08:51 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Queens Village, NY
Posts: 613
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hawkingfan
There is testable and repeatable evidence to prove the existence of gravity. Mathematics and observation can support its existence and behavior. The mind is nothing but a word used to label an abstract idea, just like the word "god". You can't compare it to gravity.
Very well, you are not saying that the mind does not exist, right? I am not comparing "gravity" with "mind," what I am saying is that these things exist and are invisible. You actually furthered my point. It does not mean that an invisible cannot exist, and put forth any words to describe them.
7thangel is offline  
Old 03-24-2003, 09:23 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In a nondescript, black helicopter.
Posts: 6,637
Default

You see, the sky is blue because giant leprechauns abound in the forest beyond the trees, bathing in a waterfall of flowers and drunk on a pair of old leather boots.

See! Thus you prove my point for me! Aha!

braces_for_impact is offline  
Old 03-24-2003, 09:31 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A world less bright without WinAce.
Posts: 7,482
Default Re: Re: Repost

Quote:
Originally posted by 7thangel
The Bible is intentionally written to be misunderstood by the lost. You have misunderstandood the bible, and then use it against me. The story you quoted is actually supporting my post. It will be useless for you to have proof of God's existence if you are ignorant of the godhead.
What? Did you even read it? I mean, sheesh, whether the bible was meant to be clear or not is a different story, but in the 1 Kings 18 story pretty explicitly SAYS, these people had turned away from 'the LORD,' (v. 18 "You have abandoned the Lord's comands and have followed the Baals.)

How is this in any way different from those here who have turned away from the Lord to follow their own ways?

Tell me to if this is an incorrect summary of the story:
Elijah found people in apostasy, worshipping another god. SO he challenged the other god to a showdown. The other god didn't show up, and god did, thus causing many to return to their faith in him.

How did these people 'understand the godhead' (whatever that actually means) any differently than any other group that has turned away in the past?

Once again we come to a point where a christian expects me to believe his contorted sophistry above and beyond what god clearly and explicitly wrote in his word. Doesn't that scare you at all 7th?
Angrillori is offline  
Old 03-24-2003, 09:45 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Queens Village, NY
Posts: 613
Default Re: Re: To all Atheists:About making challenge.

Quote:
Originally posted by Wyz_sub10
7thangel, can you please reconcile these two statements, or explain why reconciliation is not necessary:

I just want to clarify that God wants us to be convinced intellectually and emotionally.

and

The Bible is intentionally written to be misunderstood by the lost.
On the first statement, I speak having no knowledge of who's who to be saved, so I am appealing unto all.

Of the second statement, I speak of God's plans. As I always say, all things will work together for good to the chosen, meaning not all.

In any case, this is the like problem when discussing with fellow christians about God's predestination. So you will always find me of conflicting statements of appealing to everyone, while teaching predestination.
7thangel is offline  
Old 03-24-2003, 10:06 AM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Queens Village, NY
Posts: 613
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by braces_for_impact
You see, the sky is blue because giant leprechauns abound in the forest beyond the trees, bathing in a waterfall of flowers and drunk on a pair of old leather boots.

See! Thus you prove my point for me! Aha!

If I get your implication, you "totally" misunderstood me. Because I do not parallel my understanding of God to yours.
7thangel is offline  
Old 03-24-2003, 10:30 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
Default Re: Re: Re: To all Atheists:About making challenge.

Quote:
Originally posted by 7thangel
On the first statement, I speak having no knowledge of who's who to be saved, so I am appealing unto all.

Of the second statement, I speak of God's plans. As I always say, all things will work together for good to the chosen, meaning not all.

In any case, this is the like problem when discussing with fellow christians about God's predestination. So you will always find me of conflicting statements of appealing to everyone, while teaching predestination.
I don't understand how you support your original statement - "Gods wants us to be convincved"- with the rationale provided above (having no knowedge...).

How are these two related? Are you saying that your original statement applies only to those who are saved?

If so, it seems you are saying that those who are saved have to work at understanding god's message, but those who are not, have no chance to do so in any case.
Wyz_sub10 is offline  
Old 03-24-2003, 11:28 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,247
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 7thangel
Very well, you are not saying that the mind does not exist, right? I am not comparing "gravity" with "mind," what I am saying is that these things exist and are invisible.
They exist differently. Gravity exists physically. The "mind" exists as a concept. It's subjective. It's like "love". Abstract. It doesn't really exist but only as an idea. Again, you cannot compare gravity with god. There is evidence of gravity, but none of god.
Hawkingfan is offline  
Old 03-24-2003, 11:31 AM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: U.S.
Posts: 2,565
Default

I guess my unspoken challenge has always been very simple: convince me God exists. An omnipotent, omnicient God should have no problem seeing to it that this comes to pass. He should be able to pass on to his followers the knowledge necessary to make the arguements that will convince me.

I'm perfectly willing to "submit myself" to an all-powerful diety once I see good reason to. However, I'm not going to submit myself to any earthly institution without sufficient reason - certainly not just because they say so. Heck, which one that "says so" should I submit to? Christianity? Islam? Mormonism? Scientology? All at once? Maybe one at a time? In what order?

No, I'm not going to dream up challenges. There's really no need. If God is real, and God wants me to believe, I'm sure I will. I have faith that, if He's real, he can make me believe if he wants.

Since I don't... Well, draw your own conclusions. I've drawn mine.

Jamie
Jamie_L is offline  
Old 03-24-2003, 11:36 AM   #39
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Queens Village, NY
Posts: 613
Default Re: Re: Re: Repost

Quote:
Originally posted by Angrillori
What? Did you even read it? I mean, sheesh, whether the bible was meant to be clear or not is a different story, but in the 1 Kings 18 story pretty explicitly SAYS, these people had turned away from 'the LORD,' (v. 18 "You have abandoned the Lord's comands and have followed the Baals.)

How is this in any way different from those here who have turned away from the Lord to follow their own ways?

Tell me to if this is an incorrect summary of the story:
Elijah found people in apostasy, worshipping another god. SO he challenged the other god to a showdown. The other god didn't show up, and god did, thus causing many to return to their faith in him.

How did these people 'understand the godhead' (whatever that actually means) any differently than any other group that has turned away in the past?

Once again we come to a point where a christian expects me to believe his contorted sophistry above and beyond what god clearly and explicitly wrote in his word. Doesn't that scare you at all 7th?
It does not mean that Elijah did something, I should do the same. That basically is the reason why I say you are misunderstanding the Bible, and it has the big influence why you want me to accept the challenge.

I am not really scared, rather it gives me much burden to answer the ignorance, and frustrated when I see others who do not really understand. And I feel sorry for those who have closed their ears on hearing, or understanding, my defenses.
7thangel is offline  
Old 03-24-2003, 11:54 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Repost

Quote:
Originally posted by 7thangel
I am not really scared, rather it gives me much burden to answer the ignorance, and frustrated when I see others who do not really understand. And I feel sorry for those who have closed their ears on hearing, or understanding, my defenses.
...or perhaps you are not explaining yourself very well at times. It could be everyone else, but if many people (myself included) have difficulty understanding the knots you tie, maybe it's you.
Wyz_sub10 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.