Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-17-2003, 07:16 AM | #31 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 20
|
Quote:
|
|
07-17-2003, 07:17 AM | #32 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 46
|
|
07-17-2003, 07:17 AM | #33 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 920B Milo Circle
Lafayette, CO
Posts: 3,515
|
My concern about this is whether the woman having a gun makes the general situation more or less dangerous.
What is more likely? That the weapon will be used to prevent a crime, or that the weapon will be used to aid in committing a crime? Using the weapon to prevent a crime means that one has the time to get to the weapon, make it useful (by loading it, or turning off the safety, or unlocking a trigger lock), and employ it against the potential criminal. What percentage of crimes actually give the victim the luxury of that much time? It is also relevant to note that the amount of time it takes to employ a weapon is inversely proportional to the steps taken to render the weapon safe when not in use. If the only step that needs to be taken to emply a gun is to grab it and release the safety, then this requires a person walking around with a loaded gun with the safety on. Which is far more dangerous -- making far more likely that the gun will become an instrument used either to commit a crime, or in a tragic accident. In those cases where one does not have time to deploy the weapon, one is in effect making the weapon available to the criminal. (What rapist would have moral qualms against taking the gun?). Once taken, it can be used -- if not on this victim, then on the next. (No seven-day waiting period here.) There is also concern over the gun being stolen -- either by somebody who is in the process of performing another crime (e.g., snatching a purse, or car-jacking), or deliberately by somebody who wants to use it (e.g., "I would really like to go in and blow my boss's head off right now and I know that Ms. Smith carries a gun. I wonder if I can get it from her."). |
07-17-2003, 07:19 AM | #34 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 20
|
Quote:
22% of injured victims of an unreported attempted rape received medical treatment, 1992-2000 |
|
07-17-2003, 07:23 AM | #35 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
|
Quote:
"According to the National Crime Victimization Survey there were an estimated 248,000 rapes and sexual assaults against victims over the age of 12 in the US in 2001. (US Department of Justice) According to the National Victim Center, 683,000 women are raped each year. (1992)" Either both these figures are for the US in which case the rape rate has drastically reduced in the last ten years OR the second figure is for the entire world in which case the US with less than 5% of the population has over 30% of all rapes. Which is it? Amen-Moses |
|
07-17-2003, 07:25 AM | #36 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: washington, NJ 07882
Posts: 253
|
People desperately need to be educated about gun use in order to use one. Gun liscences should be similar to car liscences, in that you should have to pass a test of your knowledge and competency of gun use and responsibility. Perhaps having a psychological evaluation might not be too bad of an idea either.
Many of the injuries incured against those who carry guns is simply due to the fact they do not know how to wield them. While I don't have any disdain for non-lethal weapons, I also see no problem with a responsible woman having a gun for self defense. My opinion of them shooting a would be rapist/mugger has already been mentioned in this thread "good riddance to bad rubbish". |
07-17-2003, 07:27 AM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisneyland
Posts: 854
|
Quote:
|
|
07-17-2003, 07:30 AM | #38 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
|
Quote:
Injury stats usually come from hospitals and clinics but if they recieved no treatment then either they didn't go to one or they did and were deemed uninjured. Another criticism would be how do you define "attempted rape", i.e is a drunken fat bloke who you can easily outrun chasing you saying "I want you babe" an attempted rape? How about the mugger who you escape from before even ascertaining his motives (maybe because with a face full of mace or a groin full of knee he had other things on his mind than sharing that information) an attempted rape? Amen-Moses |
|
07-17-2003, 07:39 AM | #39 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
|
|
07-17-2003, 07:49 AM | #40 | ||||||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC, 5th floor, on the left
Posts: 372
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|