![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 172
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 172
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 141
|
![]()
I would love to become a Zen Buddhist, but all of the ones I know of believe, in some form or another, in reincarnation and the continuation of life after death. If you know of any specific school that denies this, please let me know.
Nero |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: England
Posts: 34
|
![]()
While it is true that rebirth/reincarnation forms a backdrop to the buddhist faith, at least as it manifests as a "Religion", there are fundamental texts that advocate what in practice is an agnostic position.................for example Majjhima Nikaya, Suttas 2 and 63, from the Theravada tradition.
".................shall I be in the future? Shall I not be in the future? What shall I be in the future? How shall I be in the future? Having been what, what shall I become in the future.............." According to the texts, such questions are "attending unwisely" and will inevitably lead to wrong views. "Attending wisely" is to consider....."this is suffering"......."this is the origin of suffering"........."this is the cessation of suffering"......."this is the way that leads to the cessation of suffering". This is in accord with the words of the Buddha........"I teach this and this alone, suffering and the ending of suffering". "After death a Buddha exists - I have left undeclared. After death a Buddha does not exist - I have left undeclared. After death a Buddha both exists and does not exist - I have left undeclared. After death a buddha neither exists nor does not exist - I have left undelcared. And why............because it is unbenificial, it does not belong to the fundamentals of the holy life............" Personally I would agree with the words of the Buddhist writer Stephen Batchelor who is an agnostic towards "rebirth"............he states that such teachings are all part of the "metaphysics of hope and fear"..........."Agnosticism is no excuse for indecision. if anything, it is a catalyst for action; for in shifting concern away from a future life and back to the present, it demands an ethics of empathy rather than a metaphysics of hope and fear." (Buddhism Without Beliefs" (As far as Zen is concerned, what seems fundamental would agree with the texts above.............. a refusal to affirm or deny, both attitudes being part of the dual world of thought that must be "transcended" .........in favour of living in the here and now with total awareness) Derek |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: umop apisbn
Posts: 568
|
![]() Quote:
You can be a Buddhist and not believe in rebirth. In fact, it would be closer to the teachings of the historical Buddha to discount rebirth if you had doubts than it would be to believe in it simply because it is traditional. I personally have no damn clue what happens when we die, and know a lot of other Buddhists who don't either ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: England
Posts: 34
|
![]()
Yet the Buddha was not a strict agnostic himself. He did claim to know many things.....but these he saw and understood with direct insight and understanding. His attitude seemed to be that until the causes of suffering/dukkha were eradicated within us then our beliefs/wishes/assumptions would merely be predjudices based upon desire, ignorance and conditioning.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: U.S.
Posts: 4,171
|
![]() Quote:
Philosophical ones would find the idea of an afterlife to generally be laughable. Religious ones, which in my mind is a perversion of the intent of the writings, offer claims of immorality and reincarnation. DC |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the edge
Posts: 509
|
![]()
While it is convenient to lump the various schools of Buddhism, it often leads to misunderstanding. There are great differences between some of them, especially with respect to 'mystical beliefs'.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Heaven, just assasinated god
Posts: 578
|
![]()
IIRC, Daoism only have immortality. No reincarnation.
Reincarnation & immortality (both at the same time) is something most likely practised by followers of Daoism which got mixed with Buddhism. How you would classify such practisioners is up to you. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|